Lightweight Footing for Support Posts Using Structural Foam

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional concrete footings for structural posts are labor-intensive and time-consuming, especially in limited access areas, due to their heavy weight and long curing times, which slows down construction projects and poses safety risks during handling and installation.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight footing system comprising a molded plastic shell that can be partially filled with structural foam, which provides load-bearing stability and can be shaped to accommodate a steel exoskeleton for increased capacity, allowing for quicker installation and reduced labor, especially in confined spaces like crawl spaces under homes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional pre-cast concrete footings are used, then load-bearing capacity is achieved, but weight and handling difficulty increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidfooting weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The footing system is divided into two separate components: a lightweight plastic shell that provides structural form and positioning, and structural foam that provides load-bearing capacity. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently - the shell remains lightweight for easy handling while the foam delivers the required strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention combines two different materials - plastic (for the shell) and structural foam (for load-bearing) - into a composite footing system. This composite approach leverages the advantages of each material: plastic provides durability and light weight, while structural foam provides high strength-to-weight ratio and load-bearing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If pour-in-place concrete footings are used, then load-bearing capacity is achieved, but installation time and labor intensity increase due to curing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidcuring time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the material parameter from conventional concrete to structural foam. Structural foam cures rapidly (typically within hours rather than days) while achieving comparable or superior load-bearing capacity. This parameter change in material selection eliminates the lengthy curing wait time that plagues traditional concrete footings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The plastic shell is pre-formed and ready for immediate installation. The structural foam is injected and begins curing almost immediately, allowing the footing to be load-bearing within hours rather than requiring days of preliminary curing time. This preliminary preparation eliminates delays in the construction schedule.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Strength

If conventional concrete footings are used, then structural support is provided, but labor safety risks increase due to heavy lifting and handling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidsafety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the footing into a lightweight plastic shell and structural foam components, the system eliminates the need to lift and maneuver heavy concrete blocks. The plastic shell can be easily carried and positioned by workers, dramatically reducing ergonomic injuries and safety hazards while the structural foam provides the necessary structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If multiple visits are required for footing installation, then proper curing is achieved, but project productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecuring qualityVSAvoidinstallation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Changing from concrete to structural foam as the load-bearing material fundamentally alters the time parameter. Structural foam achieves adequate cure strength in hours rather than days, allowing single-visit installation. This parameter change maintains reliability of structural support while dramatically improving productivity by eliminating multi-day installation schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The lightweight footing system enables rapid installation of support posts with minimal labor and safety risks, as it eliminates the need for multiple visits and long curing times, while the foam provides immediate load-bearing capacity and can be adjusted for height, addressing the inefficiencies of traditional concrete footings.

Implementation Method 1

The plastic shell can be partially filled with a structural foam once placed in final position. The structural foam is selected for carrying loads.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFoam expansion: Foam

Data Source

PatentUS20210079654A1Lightweight footing for support posts
Publication Date: 2021.03.18 VANTERRA FOUNDATION SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US20210079654A1 patent drawing
  • US20210079654A1 patent drawing
  • US20210079654A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A lightweight footing includes a plastic shell that can be partially filled with a structural foam once placed in final position. The plastic shell can also be shaped to accommodate a steel exoskeleton that increases the load-bearing capacity of the footing significantly.