Footrest device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional footrest devices have complex mechanisms for switching between curved and planar surfaces, leading to increased weight, cost, and potential malfunctions, which do not consider user ergonomics and require leaning or lifting to switch positions.

Innovation Solution

A footrest device with a base portion featuring indentations on side surfaces for easy switching between positions using toes or the front portion of the foot, eliminating the need for leaning or lifting, and incorporating limit stops to restrict movement, designed to accommodate ergonomic standards and reduce component complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional mechanisms are used for switching between curved and planar surfaces, then position switching is achieved, but device complexity and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition switchingVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes complex switching mechanisms entirely, extracting only the essential functional elements (indentations on side surfaces) needed for position switching. This leaves the core structure while eliminating unnecessary complexity, allowing users to flip between curved and planar surfaces using simple toe or foot pressure on the indentations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The footrest device enables self-service operation where users independently switch between positions using their own feet. The indentations are strategically positioned to be activated by toe or foot pressure, allowing the device to serve itself without requiring external mechanisms, levers, or complex controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If conventional mechanisms are used for switching between curved and planar surfaces, then position switching is achieved, but device weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition switchingVSAvoidfootrest weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes heavy mechanical switching components, retaining only the essential structural elements. The indentations are formed directly in the side surfaces of the base portion, eliminating the need for separate switching mechanisms and reducing overall device weight while maintaining position switching functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If conventional mechanisms are used for switching between curved and planar surfaces, then position switching is achieved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition switchingVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts complex mechanical components that would increase manufacturing cost. By forming indentations directly in the side surfaces of the base portion, the design simplifies manufacturing processes and reduces material requirements, thereby lowering production costs while maintaining ease of position switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If complex mechanisms are used for position switching, then switching functionality is achieved, but reliability decreases due to multiple parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition switchingVSAvoiddevice reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes multiple mechanical parts and switching components that would create potential failure points. By retaining only the essential base portion with integrated indentations, the design minimizes the number of parts, eliminates complex mechanisms, and thereby improves reliability while maintaining position switching functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

5Adaptability or versatility

If conventional footrest designs are used, then basic foot support is provided, but ergonomic standards are not met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveergonomic adaptabilityVSAvoiduser comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing different surface profiles (curved and planar) in different regions of the base portion. The curved surface provides ergonomic support for the heel or arch, while the planar surface offers a flat support area, allowing users to select the most comfortable configuration for their specific ergonomic needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11547215B2Footrest device
Publication Date: 2023.01.10 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO
  • US11547215B2 patent drawing
  • US11547215B2 patent drawing
  • US11547215B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A footrest device includes a base portion adapted to be switched between a first position and a second position. The base portion includes a first surface having a curved profile, wherein the first surface provides foot support to a user when the base portion is in the first position. The base portion also includes a second surface having a planar profile, wherein the second surface provides foot support to the user when the base portion is in the second position. The base portion further includes a pair of side surfaces extending between the first surface and the second surface, wherein at least one of the pair of side surfaces defines an indentation. The footrest device also includes at least one limit stop projecting from the first surface of the base portion, wherein the at least one limit stop is disposed proximate at least one of the pair of side surfaces.