Footwear Soles With Co-Molded Lattice and Solid Regions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for manufacturing footwear soles using lattice structures and solid components face challenges in combining these elements effectively, leading to increased manufacturing difficulty, time, and cost, with adhesive bonding being weak, prone to degradation, and adding weight.

Innovation Solution

A co-molding process integrates a lattice structure with a solid material during molding, mechanically binding them without adhesives, allowing for customized performance characteristics by controlling the flow of solid material into the lattice structure through adjustable parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If adhesive bonding is used to combine lattice structure with solid component, then the sole can be assembled from separate parts, but the bonding is weak, prone to degradation, and adds weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly capabilityVSAvoidbonding strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the lattice structure and solid component into a single co-molded piece, eliminating the need for adhesive bonding. The lattice structure is integrated directly into the molded sole, creating a unified component that achieves both manufacturing ease and structural strength without the weaknesses of adhesive joints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a co-molding process as an intermediary manufacturing method that combines lattice structure fabrication and solid component formation in one step. This mediator process eliminates the need for secondary bonding operations and their associated weaknesses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If adhesive bonding is used to combine lattice structure with solid component, then the sole can be assembled from separate parts, but the process adds weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly capabilityVSAvoidsole weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the lattice structure and solid component into one integrated molded piece, eliminating the additional weight from adhesives and multiple assembly steps. The co-molding process creates a single-component sole that is lighter than assembled alternatives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional molding methods are used to manufacture the sole, then the manufacturing cost is low, but the ability to customize performance characteristics is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidperformance customization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the lattice structure parameters (cell size, wall thickness, density) in different regions of the sole to achieve customized performance characteristics. This allows different areas of the sole to have tailored mechanical properties while maintaining cost-effective molding processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by modifying lattice structure geometry, material composition, and density distributions within the molded sole. These parameter variations enable customization of performance characteristics such as cushioning, support, and energy return while maintaining manufacturing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If lattice structure with varying unit cells is used, then the performance characteristics can be optimized, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance optimizationVSAvoidlattice structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by creating regions with different unit cell characteristics (density, size, geometry) within the lattice structure. This allows performance optimization in specific areas while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through systematic regional variations rather than entirely complex structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent manages complexity through parameter changes by systematically varying lattice parameters (cell size, wall thickness, density) across different regions. This controlled parameter variation achieves performance optimization while maintaining manufacturability through predictable, scalable design approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12446655B2Soles having a co-molded lattice structure and solid region, footwear having the sole, and methods of manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2025.10.21 ADIDAS AG
  • US12446655B2 patent drawing
  • US12446655B2 patent drawing
  • US12446655B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sole for an article of footwear includes a plurality of portions, including at least a first portion and a second portion. The first portion includes a lattice structure having a plurality of unit cells. The plurality of unit cells may include a first subset of unit cells and a second subset of unit cells that is different than the first subset of unit cells. The second portion includes a solid material that at least partially encapsulates one or more of the unit cells of the first subset of unit cells.