FOPS Test Assembly Guided Ball Drop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current FOPS tests for heavy vehicle cabs lack precision and safety due to difficulties in maintaining low temperatures, controlling the fall of a metallic ball, and preventing damage to surroundings and personnel.

Innovation Solution

A FOPS test assembly with a closed path for the metallic ball's fall, featuring a structural frame, releasable housing, linear actuator, and handling mechanisms to control and lock the ball's movement, ensuring precise and safe testing within a controlled environment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If the test is conducted in a closed and refrigerated room to maintain -20°C temperature, then the temperature control is improved, but the ball rebound could damage the walls/pavement of the room or other instrumentations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature controlVSAvoiddamage to walls/pavement/instrumentations
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the testing area into a confined drop zone directly over the cab roof, using a modular frame structure that can be positioned independently of the refrigerated room boundaries, allowing temperature maintenance while isolating the impact zone from vulnerable surroundings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A guided rail system acts as an intermediary mechanism between the ball drop and the cab roof, controlling the ball's trajectory and impact point to ensure it falls only on the intended test area, preventing rebound damage to walls and instrumentations while maintaining temperature control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If the test is made outdoor by using a previously refrigerated cab, then the setup complexity is reduced, but the temperature of the cab cannot precisely set at -20°C and wind may impart transversal load to the metallic ball

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesetup complexityVSAvoidtemperature precision and ball trajectory control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cab is pre-refrigerated to the target temperature before the test, and the entire testing assembly including temperature monitoring and ball drop mechanism is prepared in advance, allowing the test to be conducted outdoors while maintaining precise temperature control through preliminary conditioning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Natural free-fall is replaced with a mechanically guided drop system using rails and actuators that control the ball's release and trajectory, eliminating wind interference and ensuring precise positioning at the designated impact point on the cab roof

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If the ball is released to fall on the roof freely without any control, then the device complexity is reduced, but the exact height and positioning with respect to the roof cannot be controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelease mechanism complexityVSAvoidheight and positioning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The release mechanism transitions from a static simple drop to a dynamic controlled system where the ball is held by an actuator at a precisely controlled height above the roof, allowing programmable release timing and position while maintaining relatively simple overall device architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors and control systems provide feedback on the ball's position and the cab roof location, enabling real-time adjustment of the release mechanism to ensure precise height and positioning control, with the system automatically compensating for variations in cab height or position

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If the test is successful and the ball rebounds, then the FOPS protection is verified, but the ball could harm peoples which are conducting such test

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveFOPS protection verificationVSAvoidharm to test personnel
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The ball rebound containment function is extracted from the general testing environment and incorporated into a dedicated safety system with deflectors and barriers positioned around the drop zone, removing the hazard from the area where personnel operate while preserving the FOPS verification capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Safety barriers and energy-absorbing materials are pre-installed in the ball's potential rebound path before the test occurs, creating a protective envelope that cushions or redirects the ball away from personnel areas, ensuring safety is built into the test setup rather than added as an afterthought

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The assembly enables safe and precise FOPS testing by maintaining the cab at a predefined temperature, controlling the ball's fall, and preventing damage, enhancing safety for both the vehicle and personnel conducting the test.

Implementation Method 1

The ball is then released to fall freely by gravity on the roof of the vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS11624689B2Assembly for FOPS test
Publication Date: 2023.04.11 BLUE LEAF I P INC
  • US11624689B2 patent drawing
  • US11624689B2 patent drawing
  • US11624689B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A falling-object protective structures (FOPS) test assembly for carrying a FOPS test of a wall of cab of a heavy vehicle is configured to releasably carry a test ball for the FOPS test above a predefined distance above wall. The FOPS test assembly defines a closed path for test ball from its housing position to wall, and includes a handling means configured to assume a first condition in which they do not interfere with the passage of test ball through the closed path when ball passes through closed path in a first direction and a second condition in which handling means lock and hold test ball within the closed path once test ball passes again through the closed path in a second direction opposite to the first direction.