Forage Harvester Control Hierarchy for Coordinated Working Units

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current forage harvesters operate independently, neglecting reciprocal effects between working units, which can lead to suboptimal performance and efficiency in harvesting processes.

Innovation Solution

A driver assistance system that integrates multiple working units into a higher-level control hierarchy, considering interactions between units to optimize operating parameters and improve overall efficiency, quality, and cost through data processing and sensor feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If working units operate independently with individual control, then each unit can be controlled separately, but the overall system efficiency and performance are suboptimal due to neglecting reciprocal effects between units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall system efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol hierarchy complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple independent control units into a unified higher-level control hierarchy that coordinates all working units. The control unit receives sensor data from multiple sources (moisture sensors, density sensors, speed sensors) and sends coordinated control signals to multiple actuators (chopping device, post-acceleration device, delivery shaft), thereby optimizing overall system efficiency while managing complexity through integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit serves multiple functions simultaneously: it processes sensor data from various working units, determines optimal operating parameters, controls multiple actuators, and adapts settings based on material properties. This multi-functional approach improves productivity without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the spacing between working units is fixed, then the structure is simple, but the system cannot adapt to variations in moisture, density, or speed of harvested material

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to material propertiesVSAvoidadjustable mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of spacing between working units through actuators that can change the position of the post-acceleration device and delivery shaft relative to each other. This allows the system to adapt to varying material properties (moisture, density, speed) while the control unit coordinates these adjustments based on sensor feedback, managing complexity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit changes operational parameters (spacing, speed, acceleration) based on sensor data about material properties. When moisture, density, or speed varies, the control unit adjusts the spacing between working units and their operational parameters to optimize performance, enabling adaptability without requiring complex manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If real-time sensor monitoring and control is implemented, then harvesting quality and efficiency are optimized, but the system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting qualityVSAvoidsensor and control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control where sensors continuously monitor material properties (moisture, density, speed) and deliver shaft rotation speed, and the control unit uses this feedback to adjust operational parameters in real-time. This feedback loop optimizes harvesting quality by adapting to actual material conditions while the control unit manages the complexity of coordinating multiple sensors and actuators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11122739B2Forage harvester and method for operating a forage harvester
Publication Date: 2021.09.21 CLAAS SELBSTFAHRENDE ERNTEMASCHINEN GMBH
  • US11122739B2 patent drawing
  • US11122739B2 patent drawing
  • US11122739B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An agricultural work machine for performing an agricultural work process is disclosed. The agricultural work machine includes working units and a driver assistance system for controlling the working units to achieve one or more quality criteria. The driver assistance system may set parameters to control the working units in order to satisfy the criteria. Further, the driver assistance system includes a graphical user interface through which an operator may change the setting of one of the quality criteria. Responsive to the change, the driver assistance system may determine the expected effects on other quality criteria. In addition, the driver assistance system may visually highlight the expected effects on the graphical user interface.