Forage Harvester Feed Roller Dynamics and Spring Preload

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current forage harvesters face issues with insufficient pre-compacting force at smaller mat heights leading to excess lengths in chopped crop, and existing solutions like hydraulic systems suffer from inertia problems, causing unwanted lengths during rapid mat height changes.

Innovation Solution

A feed device with a mechanical spring between the movable output of an externally powered adjustment drive and the feed roller, allowing for independent contact pressure control, enabling rapid adjustment to mat height changes and maintaining sufficient clamping force.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If mechanical springs are used to apply pre-compression force to feed rollers, then sufficient force can be achieved with simple structure, but the force is insufficient at smaller mat heights leading to excess lengths in chopped crop

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepre-compression forceVSAvoidchop length consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The feed roller position is made dynamically adjustable through an externally powered adjustment drive (hydraulic or electric motor) that can rapidly change the roller position in response to detected mat height variations, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions rather than relying on fixed spring force

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A detection device (optical sensor, capacitive sensor, or inductive sensor) continuously monitors mat height and provides feedback to a control unit, which then adjusts the feed roller position accordingly to maintain optimal pre-compaction force across varying mat heights

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Force

If hydraulic cylinders with pressure accumulators are used to generate constant contact pressure, then sufficient force can be maintained, but the inertia of the hydraulic cylinder prevents rapid adjustment when mat height changes quickly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact pressureVSAvoidadjustment speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The hydraulic cylinder is replaced with an externally powered adjustment drive consisting of an electric motor with a gear mechanism, which has significantly lower inertia and can respond much faster to control signals, enabling rapid adjustment of feed roller position when mat height changes suddenly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Force

If spring preload is increased to maintain sufficient force at smaller mat heights, then pre-compression force improves, but this causes premature material fatigue of springs and extremely high contact pressure with larger mat heights

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepre-compression forceVSAvoidspring durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a high-preload spring that operates across all conditions, the system uses a detection device to monitor mat height and an externally powered adjustment drive to dynamically adjust feed roller position, maintaining optimal force without excessive preload that would cause spring fatigue or damage to the crop

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures consistent contact pressure across varying mat heights, reducing excess lengths in chopped material and minimizing mechanical stress on rollers.

Implementation Method 1

arrange a mechanical spring between the movable output of the adjustment drive and the feed roller that can be moved by it, which preferably prestresses the feed roller that can be moved by the adjustment drive against the other feed roller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP1790210B1Feeding device for a forage harvester
Publication Date: 2009.03.25 DEERE & CO
  • EP1790210B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1790210B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The device (32) has rotatable lower feedrolls (34, 35) mounted on a pick up housing (38) and set in rotation in harvesting mode by a cutting-length gear. Rotatable upper feedrolls (36, 37) are arranged to be movable relative to the lower feedrolls. An external force-activated adjustment drive changes the position of one of the upper feedrolls (36, 37) relative to one of the lower feedrolls. A spring such as tension spring is arranged between the adjustment drive and the upper feedrolls. Ends of the spring are connected to one of the feedrolls and to an oscillating and/or movable holder.