Forage Harvester Roller Drive Arrangement With Superposition Gear

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing drive arrangements for conditioning rollers in forage harvesters are cumbersome to adjust speed, inefficient, and prone to high belt wear, particularly when using a single belt to drive both rollers, which requires oversized and expensive belt variators.

Innovation Solution

A drive arrangement featuring a main belt drive connected to an input shaft with separate mechanical drive trains for each roller, including a direction-reversing gear and a superposition gear with an additional drive, allowing for variable speed adjustment without relying on belt power transmission across the outer surfaces, enabling efficient high-power transmission and addressing speed differences between rollers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If a single belt is used to drive both conditioning rollers, then the belt must transmit the entire drive power, but this requires an oversized and expensive belt variator

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive power transmissionVSAvoidbelt variator size and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drive system is segmented into two separate belt drives, each responsible for driving one conditioning roller. This segmentation allows each belt to transmit only a portion of the total power (approximately half), enabling the use of smaller, more cost-effective belt variators while maintaining the ability to clear blockages when both rollers operate together

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If one conditioning roller is driven with a hydraulic motor, then speed adjustment is possible, but efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed adjustmentVSAvoiddrive efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The hydraulic motor is replaced with a mechanically adjustable belt variator that uses variable-speed pulleys and adjustable belt positioning. This mechanical adjustment system maintains high efficiency by eliminating hydraulic energy conversion losses while still enabling speed adjustment of the conditioning rollers during operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If one conditioning roller is driven with a second variable-speed drive superimposed on the mechanical drive, then speed adjustment is possible, but complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed adjustmentVSAvoiddrive train complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamically adjustable belt variators with variable-speed pulleys that allow continuous speed adjustment during operation. The belt position can be changed while the system is running, enabling flexible speed control without requiring complex multi-drive arrangements or superimposed drives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If belt pulleys are exchanged to change speed, then speed adjustment is possible, but the adjustment is cumbersome and not possible during harvesting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed adjustmentVSAvoidspeed adjustment convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamically adjustable belt variators with movable pulleys and adjustable belt positioning mechanisms that allow speed changes during operation from the cab. This eliminates the need to stop harvesting to exchange pulleys, providing continuous adaptability while maintaining ease of operation through remote control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

5Ease of operation

If a belt transmits power across the outer surfaces, then speed adjustment is possible, but belt wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed adjustmentVSAvoidbelt service life
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces belt surface friction-based power transmission with a mechanical drive system using separate belt drives with proper tensioning and alignment. This substitution reduces excessive belt wear while maintaining the capability for speed adjustment through variable-speed pulleys

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution simplifies speed adjustments, reduces belt wear, and allows for problem-free high-power transmission, essential for clearing blockages, while enabling efficient speed adjustment according to crop conditions, enhancing operational efficiency and reducing equipment costs.

Implementation Method 1

a first drive train between the input shaft and a first conditioning roller, which includes a first belt drive and a direction-reversing gear

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical power transmission: Gear

Implementation Method 2

a second drive train between the input shaft and a second conditioning roller, which includes a second belt drive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical power transmission: Pulley

Implementation Method 3

The output speed of the first and/or second drive train can be changed by means of a superposition gear connected to an additional drive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVariable speed transmission: Gear

Data Source

PatentEP3639649B1Drive arrangement for the variable-speed drive of a conditioning device of a forage harvester equipped with two conditioning rollers
Publication Date: 2021.04.14 DEERE & CO
  • EP3639649B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3639649B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3639649B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A drive arrangement for the variable-speed drive of a conditioning unit of a forage harvester (10) equipped with two conditioning rollers (28, 28') comprises a driven input shaft (66), a first drive train between the input shaft (66) and a first conditioning roller (28), which includes a first belt drive and a reversing gearbox (68), and a second drive train between the input shaft (66) and a second conditioning roller (28'), which includes a second belt drive. The output speed of the first and/or second drive train is variable by means of a superimposed gearbox connected to an additional drive (64).