Multilevel Force Balanced Drill Bit Design for Vibration Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional downhole drilling tools, such as rotary drill bits, often experience significant imbalance forces during transition drilling through non-uniform formations, leading to vibration and reduced drilling efficiency, as they are designed assuming uniform formation engagement.

Innovation Solution

The design and manufacturing of multilevel force-balanced downhole drilling tools, where cutting elements are strategically positioned to balance forces acting on each element as they engage with different formation layers, using simulations to optimize the number, location, and configuration of cutting elements to minimize imbalance forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional downhole drilling tools are designed assuming uniform formation engagement, then the design and manufacturing process is simplified, but significant imbalance forces and vibration occur during transition drilling through non-uniform formations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign and manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidimbalance forces and vibration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting elements are segmented into different groups (first plurality and second plurality) with different radial positions and engagement characteristics. This segmentation allows each group to be optimized for specific formation conditions, enabling the tool to handle non-uniform formations while maintaining force balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different cutting elements are assigned different local qualities based on their radial positions. The first plurality of cutting elements at a first radial position have different engagement characteristics than the second plurality at a second radial position, allowing each element to be optimized for specific formation layers encountered during transition drilling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If cutting elements are positioned to balance forces during transition drilling, then stability and rate of penetration increase, but the design complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling stabilityVSAvoidcutting element configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting element configuration employs asymmetric radial positioning where the first plurality of cutting elements are positioned at a first radial position and the second plurality at a second radial position. This asymmetric arrangement is specifically designed to balance forces during the asymmetric conditions of transition drilling through non-uniform formations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting elements are pre-positioned at specific radial distances from the drill bit axis before drilling begins. This preliminary configuration ensures that when transition drilling occurs, the forces on cutting elements are already balanced, preventing vibration and instability without requiring complex real-time adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If all cutting elements are positioned at the same radial distance, then the manufacturing process is simpler, but force imbalance occurs when only some elements engage the formation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting element positioning simplicityVSAvoidforce balance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The solution moves from a single-dimension radial positioning to a multi-dimensional arrangement by introducing different radial positions (first radial position and second radial position) for different groups of cutting elements. This dimensional change enables force balance in the radial direction while maintaining manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS9811630B2Multilevel force balanced downhole drilling tools and methods
Publication Date: 2017.11.07 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US9811630B2 patent drawing
  • US9811630B2 patent drawing
  • US9811630B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various downhole drilling tools designed and manufactured at least in part on evaluating respective forces acting on respective groups and sets of cutting elements during simulated engagement with the downhole end of a wellbore and drilling from a first downhole formation into a second downhole formation. Simulating forces acting on each cutting element as the cutting element contacts a downhole formation may be used to force balance downhole drilling tools during transition drilling or non-uniform downhole drilling conditions. Multilevel force balanced downhole drilling tools may be designed using five respective simulations, cutter group level, neighbor cutter group level, cutter set level, group of N (N=3 or N=4) consecutive cutters level and all cutters level. Various cutter layout procedures and algorithms may also be used to design multilevel force balanced downhole drilling tools which may drill faster with higher lateral stability, especially during downhole transiting drilling conditions.