Force-Sensing Cursor Control Grip for Vibrating Flight Units

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Flight unit graphical user interface cursor control is impaired by vibrations, leading to inaccurate cursor positioning and limited control of other components due to shared hand operation.

Innovation Solution

A cursor control device with a graspable body and force sensor that allows precise cursor movement along X and Y axes, integrated with control components and a confirming button to prevent unwanted actuations, enabling stable and ergonomic control in vibrating environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a trackball is used for cursor control, then the cursor can be moved over the screen, but vibrations cause the operator's hand to tremble and accurate positioning becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecursor controlVSAvoidcursor positioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical trackball system with a voice recognition system that uses acoustic signals to control cursor movement. The voice-activated cursor control eliminates the need for manual manipulation of mechanical components, thereby removing the negative impact of vibrations on positioning accuracy while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces voice commands as an intermediary between the operator and the cursor control system. Instead of directly manipulating the trackball, the operator speaks commands that are translated into cursor movements, creating a buffer that isolates the control system from vibration-induced hand tremors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the operator uses the same hand to move the cursor and actuate other control components, then all controls can be accessed, but the number of available finger positions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol component accessibilityVSAvoidcontrol layout
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the voice recognition system universal for both cursor control and actuation of other control components. A single voice interface handles multiple functions including cursor movement, button presses, and parameter adjustments, eliminating the need for separate physical controls and freeing up device space while maintaining full control accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the control functions from the physical domain and transfers them to the voice domain. By removing the need for physical manipulation of multiple control components, the system simplifies the control layout while maintaining versatility through voice-activated commands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If a directional transducer moved by the thumb is used, then cursor control is provided, but vibrations still affect the operator's hand and control accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecursor controlVSAvoidcontrol accuracy in vibrating environment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical directional transducer system with a voice recognition system. This substitution removes the dependency on manual manipulation that is susceptible to vibration effects, thereby improving reliability and control accuracy in vibrating environments while maintaining ease of operation through natural voice commands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device provides precise cursor control and simultaneous operation of multiple control components, maintaining accuracy and ergonomics even in harsh vibrating conditions.

Implementation Method 1

a force sensor (7) coupled to the graspable body (6) and designed to sense the movements of the graspable body (6) with respect to the base structure (5) along at least first axis (X) and a second axis (Y)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce sensing: Force

Data Source

PatentEP4338026B1Device for controlling a cursor of a graphical user interface of a flight unit
Publication Date: 2024.11.20 LEONARDO SPA
  • EP4338026B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4338026B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP4338026B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

Device (1) for controlling a cursor (C) of a graphical user interface (2) of a flight unit (3), comprising a base structure (5); a graspable body (6) shaped to be grasped by a hand of an operator and movable with respect to the base structure (5) by the manual force provided by the operator by means of his/her hand; a force sensor (7) coupled to the graspable body (6) and designed to sense the movements of the graspable body (6) with respect to the base structure (5) along at least a first axis (X) and a second axis (Y); an interface circuit (8) for converting the signals provided by the force sensor (7) into control signal of the graphical user interface (2) of the flight unit (3) in order to move the cursor (C) along a first axis and a second axis of the graphical user interface (2) based on the force provided to the graspable body (6) by the operator.