Force-Determining Surgical Retraction Device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surgical retraction devices often exert excessive forces on tissues, leading to trauma, post-operative pain, and prolonged healing times, with existing methods like median sternotomy risking sternal fractures and instability.

Innovation Solution

A retraction device with opposed retraction members and a drive mechanism, equipped with a force-determining device to measure and control the force applied to tissues during retraction, allowing for gradual and controlled tissue separation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If retraction device exerts significant forces to separate tissue quickly, then surgical access is improved, but tissue damage and post-operative pain increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of tissue separationVSAvoidtissue damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates force-sensing capabilities that provide real-time feedback on the forces being applied to tissue during retraction. This feedback mechanism allows the system to monitor force levels and adjust retraction parameters dynamically, preventing excessive forces that would cause tissue damage while maintaining adequate retraction speed for surgical access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The retraction device employs dynamic control of retraction forces, transitioning from static force application to dynamically adjustable forces. The system can vary force magnitude and rate of application based on real-time tissue response and surgical requirements, optimizing both the speed of access and the minimization of tissue trauma.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Area of stationary object

If retraction device applies high force to achieve sufficient exposure, then surgical access is improved, but sternal fracture risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical exposure areaVSAvoidsternal bone strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Force monitoring provides real-time feedback on the loads being applied to the sternum during retraction. This allows the system to detect approaching fracture thresholds and adjust retraction forces accordingly, maintaining sufficient sternal separation for surgical exposure while preventing forces that would exceed bone strength limits and cause fractures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes critical parameters including force magnitude, rate of force application, and retraction speed based on real-time conditions. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the device can achieve the necessary sternal separation for adequate surgical exposure while staying within safe force limits to prevent bone fracture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If retraction is performed quickly to minimize surgical time, then productivity is improved, but healing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical procedure timeVSAvoidpost-operative healing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Real-time force feedback enables the system to optimize the balance between retraction speed and tissue protection. By monitoring tissue response continuously, the device can perform retraction at the maximum safe speed for each specific tissue condition, minimizing total surgical time while preventing the tissue trauma that would prolong healing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary assessment of tissue properties and fracture risks before initiating full retraction. This preliminary characterization allows optimization of retraction parameters in advance, enabling faster safe retraction by pre-determining the maximum safe speeds and forces for the specific patient anatomy and tissue conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7775974B2Force-determining retraction device and associated method
Publication Date: 2010.08.17 NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV
  • US7775974B2 patent drawing
  • US7775974B2 patent drawing
  • US7775974B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A retraction device including at least one pair of opposed retraction members, with each retraction member being capable of operably engaging the tissue to be retracted. A drive mechanism is operably engaged with at least one of each pair of retraction members for separating one of each pair of retraction members from the other to retract the tissue. A measuring device is operably engaged with at least one of the drive mechanism and one of each pair of retraction members, for determining and/or controlling a magnitude and/or rate of a force and/or strain imparted to the tissue by the drive mechanism via the retraction members as the tissue is being retracted. Associated devices and methods are also provided.