Force-Sensing Vehicle Remote Control With Seamless Input Surface

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote controls for vehicles lack flexibility in functionality and design, relying on discrete push buttons and limited functionality due to their structural design, which restricts the expansion of control options and user interaction.

Innovation Solution

A remote control with a deformable support surface equipped with force sensors, a processor to interpret force inputs, and a communication module to emit electromagnetic signals, allowing for continuous surface interaction and expanded functionality without traditional buttons, along with optional features like motion detection and haptic feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional push buttons are used in remote controls, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the functionality is limited and design flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefunctionalityVSAvoidstructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes traditional discrete push buttons from the remote control structure and replaces them with a force sensor integrated into a deformable support surface. This extraction of the button element allows the surface to be continuous and seamless while maintaining input functionality through force detection at different locations or patterns on the surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The deformable support surface with integrated force sensor serves multiple functions: it acts as both the structural support element and the input detection mechanism. The continuous surface can detect different input locations, forces, and patterns to trigger various commands, providing multi-functionality without requiring separate buttons for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Shape

If discrete push buttons are used, then manufacturing is easier, but the external surface cannot extend continuously over the entire remote control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous surfaceVSAvoidmanufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the support surface structure with the input detection function by integrating the force sensor into the deformable support surface itself. This combination eliminates the need for separate button components and allows the external surface to extend continuously across the entire remote control while maintaining input capability through force detection on the seamless surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If force sensors are used instead of push buttons, then functionality expands and design flexibility increases, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefunctionalityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical push button system with a force sensor-based detection system. Instead of using discrete mechanical buttons that physically press switches, the continuous deformable surface with integrated force sensor detects input through mechanical force measurement, enabling more versatile functionality while reducing mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables enhanced user interaction and expanded vehicle control functionalities, such as continuous surface interaction and flexible configuration, while maintaining a seamless design without material interruptions, improving user experience and operational flexibility.

Implementation Method 1

at least one force sensor coupled to the outer casing so as to measure a force exerted on the support surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce sensing: Force

Implementation Method 2

a communication module designed to emit an electromagnetic signal associated with the determined command

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

an elastomer block interposed between the force sensor and the outer casing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3503064B1Vehicle remote control
Publication Date: 2024.03.13 VALEO COMFORT & DRIVING ASSISTANCE
  • EP3503064B1 patent drawingFigure 1~4

AI summary

A vehicle remote control (1) comprises: - an outer casing (2) defining a deformable support surface (S); - at least one force sensor (30; 40) coupled to the outer casing (2) so as to measure a force exerted on the support surface (S); - a processor (22) designed to determine a force exerted on an area (Z1; Z2; Z3) of the support surface as a function of the measured force and to determine a command to be issued as a function of the determined force; and - a communication module (24) designed to emit an electromagnetic signal associated with the determined command.