Tactile Force Sensor Surface Roughness Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for surface roughness estimation require bulky and expensive topographic measurement devices that do not provide information on friction properties, and existing tactile sensors are not suitable for estimating surface roughness.

Innovation Solution

A method using a tactile force sensor, such as a 3D MEMS force sensor, to estimate surface roughness by measuring the orthogonal force component during relative displacement, allowing for joint measurement of roughness and friction properties without the need for conventional topographic profiling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional topographic measurement devices (mechanical contact profilometers or optical devices) are used to measure surface roughness, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface roughness measurement precisionVSAvoidmeasurement device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical contact profilometers or optical measurement devices with a simple tactile force sensor that measures orthogonal force components during sliding motion. This substitution maintains sufficient measurement precision for roughness estimation while dramatically reducing device complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts only the essential measurement information needed for roughness estimation - the orthogonal force component variations during sliding - rather than performing complete topographic mapping. This extraction approach achieves adequate precision for tactile perception applications without requiring complex measurement systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If conventional topographic measurement devices are used to estimate surface roughness, then measurement precision is improved, but the devices do not provide information on friction properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface roughness measurement precisionVSAvoidfriction property information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The tactile force sensor simultaneously provides roughness estimation and friction characterization through its force measurements. By measuring both the orthogonal force variations (for roughness) and parallel force components (for friction), the single sensor achieves multi-functionality that conventional topographic devices cannot provide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges roughness measurement and friction measurement into a single integrated process using the force sensor. Both types of information are obtained simultaneously during the same sliding operation, eliminating the need for separate measurement systems and providing comprehensive surface characterization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Device complexity

If tactile force sensors are used to estimate surface roughness, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates due to influence from local adhesion and sliding properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement device complexityVSAvoidsurface roughness measurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts only the orthogonal force component (F_ortho) that is perpendicular to the sliding direction, which is primarily influenced by surface topography rather than adhesion or sliding properties. This selective extraction isolates the roughness-related signal from confounding friction-related signals, maintaining measurement precision despite using a simple sensor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies directional selectivity to the force measurement by focusing specifically on the orthogonal component rather than the total force. This local quality approach - measuring only in the direction perpendicular to motion - filters out adhesion and sliding effects that occur parallel to motion, thereby improving precision for roughness estimation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If mechanical contact profilometers are used to measure surface topography, then measurement precision is improved, but the devices are bulky and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface topography measurement precisionVSAvoiddevice size and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces bulky mechanical contact profilometers with compact tactile force sensors based on MEMS technology or simple force-sensitive resistors. This substitution maintains adequate measurement precision for roughness estimation while reducing device size, cost, and complexity by several orders of magnitude.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs inexpensive force sensing elements that can be easily manufactured and replaced if needed. Rather than investing in expensive, fragile optical or precision mechanical systems, the patent uses simple, robust, and economical force sensors that achieve the required measurement precision at a fraction of the cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a cost-effective and compact means to estimate surface roughness, independent of local adhesion and sliding properties, with improved accuracy using statistical parameters calculated from force variations, enabling precise characterization of surface textures.

Implementation Method 1

measurement, during the relative displacement of the force sensor with respect to the surface, by at least one force F ortho perceived by the force sensor along a direction which is substantially orthogonal to said direction of displacement and parallel to said surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP2667144B1Method for estimating a roughness of a surface
Publication Date: 2015.12.02 COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES
  • EP2667144B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2667144B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2667144B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

Method for estimating a roughness R of a surface (150), comprising the following steps: - relative displacement of a force sensor against the surface and along a direction of displacement (152) substantially parallel to the surface, - measurement, during the displacement, of a Fortho force perceived by the force sensor along a direction which is substantially orthogonal to the direction of displacement and parallel to the surface, - calculation of a statistical parameter P representative of the variations in the value of the measured Fortho force, - calculation of the roughness R such that: R=fP, f() being a known function of which at least some of the coefficients have values ​​which are a function of the characteristics of the force sensor used and of a force with which the force sensor is applied on said surface during the displacement.