Forceps Actuation Assembly With Force-Limited Jaw and Blade Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional medical devices, including forceps, face challenges in reducing packaging space, simplifying design and manufacturing, improving user experience, increasing stability, and preventing damage.

Innovation Solution

The development of a medical forceps system with an improved handpiece that includes an actuation system for controlling an end effector. This system features a drive shaft motion transfer assembly with a drive body, a clip, a drive shaft, and a spring, which facilitates the actuation of jaws and a blade, while incorporating a force-limiting mechanism to prevent over-travel and damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If conventional forceps design is used, then manufacturing and packaging are straightforward, but packaging space is excessive and design complexity cannot be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging spaceVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drive shaft is nested within the outer shaft, and the motion transfer assembly components are nested within each other in a telescopic arrangement. This allows the device to occupy minimal space during storage and packaging while maintaining full functionality during use, directly resolving the contradiction between packaging volume and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The forceps are divided into distinct modular segments including the handpiece, outer shaft, drive shaft, and end effector components. This segmentation allows each component to be independently manufactured and assembled, reducing overall packaging space while maintaining design simplicity through standardized interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If conventional actuation systems are used, then the structure is simple, but user experience and operational control are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidactuation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motion transfer assembly acts as an intermediary mechanism between the user's manual input on the handpiece and the end effector actuation. This intermediate mechanism provides precise mechanical advantage and controlled motion transfer, enhancing user experience without requiring complex electronic or hydraulic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex electronic actuation systems with a refined mechanical motion transfer assembly. This mechanical substitution maintains ease of operation through intuitive manual control while achieving precise actuation of the end effector, avoiding the complexity of electronic controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Stability of the object's composition

If conventional drive mechanisms are used, then manufacturing is simple, but stability and force control are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce control stabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The drive shaft is designed with dynamic motion transfer capabilities that adapt to varying force requirements during operation. The motion transfer assembly incorporates movable components that provide stable force control through mechanical advantage, while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through standardized mechanical elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The motion transfer assembly is pre-configured with optimized mechanical geometry and force distribution characteristics during manufacturing. This preliminary action ensures stable force control is inherent in the design, eliminating the need for complex active control systems while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If conventional motion transfer assemblies are used, then design is straightforward, but over-travel and damage prevention are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage preventionVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motion transfer assembly incorporates built-in mechanical stops and constrained motion paths that prevent over-travel before damage can occur. These protective features are integrated into the basic assembly design, providing reliability without adding significant complexity to the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enhances the functionality and reliability of medical forceps by reducing packaging space, simplifying design, improving user experience, increasing stability, and preventing damage to the device.

Implementation Method 1

a spring, which facilitates the actuation of jaws and a blade

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

incorporating a force-limiting mechanism to prevent over-travel and damage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS12274465B2Forceps actuation systems
Publication Date: 2025.04.15 GYRUS ACMI INC
  • US12274465B2 patent drawing
  • US12274465B2 patent drawing
  • US12274465B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Forceps including a housing, a first body, a second body and a drive shaft. The first body has a passageway extending therethrough. The drive shaft extending through the passageway and connected to the first body such that the first body and the drive shaft are slidable with respect to the housing to drive jaws located at a distal portion of the drive shaft between an open position and a closed position. The second body having a second passageway. The drive shaft extending through the second passageway such that the second body is guided by the drive shaft and is slidable relative to the first body and the drive shaft to displace a blade shaft between a retracted position and an extended position.