Forceps Treatment Instrument Electrode Posture Stabilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing forceps type treatment instruments face issues with unstable opening and closing of forceps pieces and manufacturing costs due to small protrusion dimensions and potential damage from strong rotation forces, as well as instability in electrode posture during operation.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates protrusion portions on the spacer member and notch portions on the forceps pieces, allowing for a larger contact area and preventing separation, along with cutout portions in the fitting holes to stabilize the forceps pieces' posture and prevent rotation with respect to the support member.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a circular-arc concave groove and convex protrusion are used to define the opening and closing angle of the electrodes, then the electrode rotation is constrained, but the contact area between the protrusion and groove is insufficient, leading to separation under strong rotation forces and potential damage to the groove

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of electrode opening and closing operationVSAvoidcontact area between protrusion and groove
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The groove is divided into two separate grooves (first concave groove and second concave groove) positioned at different locations on the insulation spacer. Each groove engages with a corresponding protrusion to constrain rotation in opposite directions. This segmentation allows each groove to be smaller and better positioned while collectively providing sufficient contact area and reliable rotational constraint without the risk of separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If cutting is used to form the protrusion on the electrode while maintaining the sliding surface, then the protrusion can be formed, but the processing requires much effort and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformation of protrusion on electrodeVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and processing effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The protrusion is formed by injection molding the insulation spacer to include recesses that receive and shape the protrusions during the molding process. This replaces the need for subsequent mechanical cutting operations, significantly reducing manufacturing complexity and cost while maintaining precise geometric control of the protrusions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If the shaft portion and fitting hole have a circular cross-section, then the assembly is simple, but the insulation spacer may rotate with respect to the forceps support member during electrode opening and closing, causing unstable electrode posture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of shaft and fitting hole structureVSAvoidposture stability of electrode during operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The fitting hole in the forceps support member and the corresponding shaft portion are given asymmetric cross-sectional shapes rather than circular shapes. This asymmetric geometry creates a non-rotational fit that prevents the insulation spacer from rotating relative to the forceps support member during electrode operation, thereby stabilizing the electrode posture while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentEP3437580B1Forceps-type treatment instrument
Publication Date: 2023.05.03 ZEON CORP
  • EP3437580B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3437580B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3437580B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

[Object] To stably open and close an electrode. [Solving Means] A protrusion portion 33f is provided in a shaft portion 33a of an insulation spacer 33 rotatably supporting a pair of forceps pieces 31a and 31b. An inner peripheral surface of a shaft hole 31c of the forceps piece is provided with a notch portion 31h. The notch portion 31h includes an end portion 31i with which a protrusion portion comes into contact when grip portions of the forceps pieces rotate in an approaching (closing) direction and an end portion 31j with which a protrusion portion comes into contact when the grip portions of the forceps pieces rotate in a separating (opening) direction.