Forceps Jaw Flange Structure for Stable Tissue Engagement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional medical devices with handpieces that actuate end effectors, such as forceps, face challenges in reducing packaging space, simplifying design and manufacturing, improving user experience, increasing stability, and preventing damage.

Innovation Solution

The development of a medical device with a handpiece that includes an actuation system allowing for the control of end effectors to be rotatable, openable, closeable, extendable, and capable of supplying electromagnetic energy, featuring a drive shaft motion transfer assembly with a force-limiting spring and clip to prevent damage and improve user experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If conventional forceps design is used, then the structure is simple, but the packaging space cannot be reduced and damage prevention is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging spaceVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The force-limiting mechanism is nested within the existing forceps structure, with the spring and clip components integrated into the jaw assembly. The clip is positioned within the jaw structure and the spring is housed within the forceps body, allowing the damage prevention mechanism to occupy minimal additional space without requiring separate external components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The force-limiting mechanism is merged with the jaw actuation system by using the existing spring-loaded clip structure that interacts with the jaw closure path. This integration allows the damage prevention feature to be combined with the existing actuation mechanism rather than adding a completely separate system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If force-limiting mechanism is added, then damage prevention is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage preventionVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The force-limiting mechanism operates automatically without requiring external control or intervention. The spring-loaded clip engages with the jaw closure path and automatically limits the force applied to tissue, providing self-regulating protection against excessive force while maintaining simple operation for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The spring element is pre-loaded to provide a predetermined force limit before jaw closure occurs. This beforehand cushioning mechanism ensures that excessive force is prevented from the outset by the spring's predetermined compression characteristics, protecting against damage before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Ease of operation

If jaw flanges are modified, then tissue engagement is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue engagementVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The flanges are added only to specific locations on the jaw where tissue engagement is needed, rather than modifying the entire jaw structure. This localized addition of engagement features allows improved tissue grasping while minimizing the overall complexity increase and keeping manufacturing relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances the stability and usability of medical devices by allowing precise control of end effectors while preventing damage through the force-limiting mechanism, improving user experience and reducing packaging complexity.

Implementation Method 1

a force-limiting spring and clip to prevent damage and improve user experience

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS11529159B2Forceps jaw flanges
Publication Date: 2022.12.20 GYRUS ACMI INC
  • US11529159B2 patent drawing
  • US11529159B2 patent drawing
  • US11529159B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Forceps can include an outer tube, a first jaw, a second jaw, and an inner tube. The outer tube can extend along a longitudinal axis and can include a pair of outer arms extending from a distal portion of the outer tube. The first jaw can be pivotably connected to the outer tube and the first jaw can include a first flange and a second flange each located at a proximal portion of the first jaw. The first flange and the second flange can each include a proximal portion extending outward of the outer tube when the jaws are in an open position. The proximal portions can be shaped to limit extension of the proximal portions laterally beyond the outer arms.