Forceps Handpiece Sleeve Coupling for Stable Motion Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical device assemblies, including forceps, face challenges in manufacturing due to inadequate attachment methods, which can lead to reduced stability, increased risk of damage, and compromised user experience.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a handpiece with a motion transfer assembly that includes a lumen, a sleeve affixed to the handpiece, and a shaft extending into the sleeve, where the sleeve is affixed using methods such as overmolding, adhesive, or welding, to enhance the attachment and stability of components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional attachment methods are used for assembling handpiece components, then assembly is simpler, but stability and reliability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment stabilityVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sleeve is integrated with the handpiece housing through overmolding, merging two previously separate components into a single integrated structure. This eliminates the need for separate attachment operations while maintaining strong mechanical bonding, thereby improving reliability without significantly increasing assembly complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The handpiece utilizes composite construction with a housing made of one material and a sleeve made of another material (e.g., metal or different polymer). This allows each component to be optimized for its specific function while the overmolding process creates a strong bond between dissimilar materials, enhancing attachment stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If robust attachment methods like welding are used, then component stability increases, but risk of damage during assembly increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent attachment strengthVSAvoidassembly damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical welding process is replaced with an overmolding process that uses material flow and cooling to create bonds. This substitution eliminates the high heat and force associated with welding that could damage sensitive components, while still achieving strong attachment through the molecular bonding of the overmolding material to the sleeve surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The attachment process transitions from high-energy welding parameters (high temperature, high force) to low-energy overmolding parameters (controlled temperature, gradual pressure). This parameter change reduces the risk of thermal damage and mechanical stress to the components while maintaining attachment strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple attachment methods are used for different components, then attachment reliability improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The overmolding process serves multiple functions simultaneously: it attaches the sleeve to the housing, provides structural support, enables motion transfer between components, and creates sealing surfaces. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate manufacturing steps into a single operation, improving reliability while maintaining manufacturing simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution improves the manufacturing process by simplifying design and assembly, reducing packaging space, enhancing user experience, increasing stability, and preventing damage to the forceps.

Implementation Method 1

the sleeve is affixed to the handpiece by overmolding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOvermolding:

Implementation Method 2

the sleeve is affixed the handpiece by adhesive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive: Adhesive

Implementation Method 3

the sleeve is affixed to the shaft by a weld

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWelding: Welding

Data Source

PatentUS12343029B2Forceps handpiece to driveshaft coupling and methods
Publication Date: 2025.07.01 GYRUS ACMI INC
  • US12343029B2 patent drawing
  • US12343029B2 patent drawing
  • US12343029B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Forceps including a handpiece configured to transfer motion from an actuator to an end effector of the forceps. The handpiece including: a lumen extending through a portion of the handpiece; a sleeve affixed to the handpiece, the sleeve extending through at least a portion of the lumen; and a shaft extending into the sleeve and affixed to the sleeve.