Forecast Model for Network Content Change Impact

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional experimental systems for evaluating changes at network accessible sites require lengthy periods, often lasting several months or even a year, to determine the long-term impact on user behavior, which is resource-intensive and slows down the pace of innovation.

Innovation Solution

Integrating a long-term forecast model that uses short-term experiment data to predict the 365-day impact of changes, allowing for earlier decision-making on implementing changes and reducing the need for prolonged experiments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional A/B experiments are run for statistical significance, then measurement precision of user behavior impact is improved, but loss of time and productivity deteriorate due to experiments lasting 3-12 months

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestatistical significance of user behavior impactVSAvoidexperiment duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting and storing user interaction data, device characteristics, and contextual information before the experiment begins. This pre-collected data serves as the foundation for rapid analysis, eliminating the need for long-duration experiments while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A machine learning model acts as an intermediary between the experimental data and the impact assessment. The model processes short-term experiment data combined with historical data to predict long-term user behavior impact, bridging the gap between brief experiments and comprehensive measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional A/B experiments are run for statistical significance, then reliability of user behavior impact assessment is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to delayed decision-making

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of user behavior impact assessmentVSAvoiddecision-making speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model serves as an intermediary that processes experimental results and historical data to generate reliable impact assessments rapidly. This intermediary enables both high reliability through comprehensive data analysis and high productivity through automated, fast processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical, time-consuming process of long-duration A/B testing with an automated computational system. The machine learning model automatically analyzes data and generates reliable assessments, substituting the traditional sequential experimental process with parallel computational processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of time

If short-term experiments are used to speed up decision-making, then loss of time is reduced, but measurement precision of long-term user behavior impact deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexperiment durationVSAvoidprediction accuracy of long-term user behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges short-term experimental data with long-term historical data to achieve both rapid decision-making and accurate long-term impact prediction. By combining these data sources, the model captures both immediate experimental effects and longer-term behavioral patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model acts as an intermediary that synthesizes short-term experiment results with historical patterns to predict long-term impact accurately. This intermediary enables the system to overcome the limitation of short experiment durations while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive user data is collected and processed, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but use of energy and computational resources worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of user behavior predictionVSAvoidcomputational processing energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and storing user data in structured formats during normal operations. This pre-organization of data reduces the computational burden during experiment analysis, maintaining measurement precision while lowering energy consumption during the actual prediction process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the most relevant features and characteristics from comprehensive user data for the machine learning model. By selecting key predictors rather than processing all raw data, the system maintains prediction accuracy while significantly reducing computational energy requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10936955B1Computationally and network bandwidth-efficient technique to determine network-accessible content changes based on computed models
Publication Date: 2021.03.02 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10936955B1 patent drawing
  • US10936955B1 patent drawing
  • US10936955B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Technologies are disclosed for determining network-accessible content changes based on computed models and providing a long term forecast of user interaction at a network accessible site based upon a short term experiment at the site. A forecast model for a period of time is generated based upon historical data of user interactions at the site. An experiment is run for a short term at the site based upon a potential change at the site. Based upon data obtained during the experiment, scores are generated for a control group (no change) and a treatment group (potential change) and compared. If there are statistically significant differences between the control group and the treatment group scores, the long term forecast may be used to forecast what the long term impact of the experiment would be based upon the short term experiment.