Forecast Model Selection Graph for Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing forecasting methods often rely on single predictive models, which may not capture the full complexity of a physical process, leading to suboptimal accuracy and variability in predictions.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system and method for combining forecasts from multiple models using a forecast model selection graph, where nodes are arranged in parent-child relationships, allowing for the transformation and selection of node forecasts into a combined forecast based on selection criteria, such as performance and metadata analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple forecast models are combined, then forecast accuracy is improved, but computational complexity and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforecast accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The forecast model selection graph is divided into hierarchical levels with multiple nodes at each level. Each node represents a specific forecast model or combination strategy, allowing the system to segment the complex combination process into manageable, discrete decision points that can be evaluated independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical dimension to the model selection process by organizing nodes in parent-child relationships across multiple levels. This dimensional structure transforms the flat complexity of model combination into a structured, multi-level evaluation framework that systematically reduces complexity at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If multiple forecast models are combined, then forecast reliability is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforecast reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes the forecast model selection graph structure with defined parent-child relationships and evaluation criteria before actual forecasting occurs. Model performance metrics and selection rules are predetermined, allowing the system to quickly traverse the hierarchy during forecasting without performing complex real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The forecast model selection graph allows for dynamic adaptation where the system can adjust which nodes are evaluated based on data characteristics and performance history. The hierarchical structure enables flexible pruning of less relevant model combinations, reducing processing time while maintaining reliability through adaptive model selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9047559B2Computer-implemented systems and methods for testing large scale automatic forecast combinations
Publication Date: 2015.06.02 SAS INSTITUTE INC
  • US9047559B2 patent drawing
  • US9047559B2 patent drawing
  • US9047559B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for evaluating performance of forecasting models. A plurality of forecasting models may be generated using a set of in-sample data. Two or more forecasting models from the plurality of forecasting models may be selected for use in generating a combined forecast. An ex-ante combined forecast may be generated for an out-of-sample period using the selected two or more forecasting models. The ex-ante combined forecast may then be compared with a set of actual out-of-sample data to evaluate performance of the combined forecast.