Forecasting Model Validation Using Proxy Regression Features

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current techniques for validating forecasting machine learning models fail to identify important and significant features, leading to inefficient use of computing resources and handling of customer complaints due to incorrect model deployment.

Innovation Solution

A validation system that processes historical time series data and output data using a proxy regression model to determine feature importance, generates perturbed data, and evaluates the model to identify top features, thereby validating the forecasting model before deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If current validation techniques are used, then model deployment proceeds without detailed feature analysis, but computing resources are wasted and customer complaints increase due to incorrect models

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel deployment efficiencyVSAvoidmodel accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs validation analysis before model deployment by creating perturbed data and training proxy models in advance. This preliminary action identifies important features and detects potential model errors before they reach production, preventing wasted resources and customer complaints while ensuring model reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a proxy regression model as an intermediary to analyze feature importance and validate the forecasting model. This intermediary model processes perturbed data and provides validation insights without requiring direct analysis of the main forecasting model, enabling efficient pre-deployment validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive validation is performed, then model quality improves, but computing resources and time are consumed during validation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel qualityVSAvoidvalidation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates perturbed copies of the original training data by introducing random variations. These copied and modified datasets are used to train proxy models for validation purposes, enabling comprehensive model quality assessment without requiring exhaustive analysis of the original model, thus reducing validation time while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes data parameters by creating perturbed versions of the training data with modified values. This parameter transformation enables the proxy model to learn feature importance patterns efficiently, providing comprehensive validation insights in reduced time compared to analyzing the original model directly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of repair

If feature importance analysis is performed, then model debugging improves, but validation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel debuggingVSAvoidvalidation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a proxy regression model as an intermediary to perform feature importance analysis. This intermediary simplifies the complex task of analyzing the main forecasting model by creating a simpler proxy that captures the essential feature-importance relationships, making debugging easier while managing validation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts feature importance information from the proxy model trained on perturbed data. By separating the validation analysis from the main model and extracting only the essential feature importance metrics, the system simplifies the debugging process while avoiding the complexity of comprehensive model analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12602602B2Systems and methods for validating forecasting machine learning models
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US12602602B2 patent drawing
  • US12602602B2 patent drawing
  • US12602602B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device may receive historical time series data and output data associated with a forecasting model and may process the historical time series data and the output data, with a proxy regression model, to determine inference data. The device may create perturbed data from the historical time series data, the output data, and the inference data, and may process the perturbed data, with the proxy regression model, to generate labelled data and to identify top features of the labelled data. The device may process subsets of the top features of the labelled data, with the proxy regression model, to determine feature data identifying an importance of each of the subsets of the top features, and may evaluate the proxy regression model and the feature data to calculate validation data for validating the forecasting model. The device may validate the forecasting model with the validation data.