Forecasting Software Project Progress via Test Facility Count Adjustments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for managing software development projects using test facilities fail to effectively evaluate the impact of increasing or decreasing the number of test facilities on project progress, making it difficult for project managers to complete projects on time.

Innovation Solution

A process management support system that calculates facility usage remaining time, specifies available time ranges for proposed changes in facility counts, and forecasts project progress based on these changes, allowing for informed allocation and resource management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the count of test facilities is increased to accelerate project progress, then project completion speed is improved, but facility allocation efficiency deteriorates due to lack of evaluation capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproject completion speedVSAvoidfacility allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by calculating and presenting the forecasted progress change when facility count is modified. The progress change calculation unit computes how project progress will change based on facility usage remaining time and available time range, providing project managers with quantitative feedback to make informed decisions about facility allocation without盲目 increasing facility counts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by forecasting project progress before actual facility allocation decisions are made. The progress change calculation unit predicts the impact of adding or removing facilities on project completion, allowing project managers to evaluate allocation options in advance and optimize facility usage before committing resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If the count of test facilities is decreased to improve allocation efficiency, then facility allocation efficiency is improved, but project progress deteriorates due to insufficient testing capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefacility allocation efficiencyVSAvoidproject progress
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback on the impact of facility reduction by calculating forecasted progress change. When project managers consider decreasing facility counts to improve allocation efficiency, the progress change calculation unit quantifies how this will affect project completion, enabling data-driven decisions that balance allocation efficiency with project progress requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies dynamics by enabling flexible adjustment of facility allocation based on real-time project needs. The progress change calculation unit allows project managers to dynamically evaluate different facility allocation scenarios and adjust allocations optimally at different project stages, rather than maintaining fixed facility assignments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Quantity of substance

If facility reservation is optimized to reduce costs, then cost efficiency is improved, but project deadline adherence deteriorates due to insufficient test capacity availability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost efficiencyVSAvoidproject deadline adherence
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by forecasting project progress before facility reservation decisions are finalized. The progress change calculation unit calculates how different facility allocation scenarios will impact project completion, allowing project managers to optimize cost efficiency while ensuring deadline adherence is maintained through informed advance planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies parameter changes by evaluating the relationship between facility count parameters and project progress outcomes. The progress change calculation unit analyzes how changes in facility availability parameters affect project completion timing, enabling project managers to find optimal balance points between cost efficiency and deadline adherence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11823097B2Process management support system, process management support method, and process management support program
Publication Date: 2023.11.21 HITACHI LTD
  • US11823097B2 patent drawing
  • US11823097B2 patent drawing
  • US11823097B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a test facility management system that can evaluate, in a software development process requiring use of test facilities, progress of a process caused by increasing or decreasing a count of the test facilities. The test facility management system can include: a project progress forecast unit that stores a process information database, a facility reservation information database, a process progress history information database, and facility count proposed change information, calculates facility usage remaining time period for the software development process based on process progress history information, specifies a time range during which facilities of the count of proposed change are available, and forecasts, based on the available time range, the progress of the software development process when work for the facility usage remaining time period is carried out by the facilities of the count of the proposed change; and a user interface that outputs the forecasted progress information.