Foreground-Protected Image Inpainting for Realistic Element Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated digital inpainting techniques often distort surrounding image areas when the area selected for removal overlaps with a foreground element, leading to unrealistic results.

Innovation Solution

A method that calculates the relative mask overlap between the user-selected area and the foreground area, applies foreground protection algorithms based on threshold comparisons, and performs inpainting processes to preserve the integrity of both foreground and background elements, using a combination of foreground protection and inpainting techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated inpainting is performed on areas overlapping with foreground elements, then the inpainting process completes quickly, but the image quality deteriorates due to distortion and unrealistic results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinpainting speedVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The image is segmented into foreground and background regions using mask generation. The inpainting process is then applied selectively to different regions: automated inpainting for background areas (maintaining speed) and protected preservation for foreground areas (maintaining quality). This segmentation resolves the contradiction by allowing different processing strategies for different image regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different quality levels are applied to different regions of the image. Foreground regions receive high-quality protection with no inpainting applied, while background regions receive automated inpainting. This local differentiation allows the system to maintain high image quality where needed while preserving productivity in other areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If manual digital inpainting is performed to maintain image quality, then image realism is improved, but the time required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidinpainting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The image is divided into foreground and background regions. Manual-quality protection is applied only to foreground regions where it matters most, while automated methods handle background regions. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high image quality without the time cost of manual inpainting across the entire image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying manual-quality inpainting to the entire image, the system applies protective measures only to the extent necessary (foreground regions). This partial action maintains image quality where critical while avoiding the excessive time cost of processing the entire image manually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Device complexity

If inpainting is applied to the entire selected area without foreground protection, then the processing is simple and fast, but foreground elements are distorted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing complexityVSAvoidforeground integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The processing is segmented into two stages: mask generation to identify foreground regions, and selective application of inpainting protection. This segmentation adds minimal complexity while effectively preserving foreground elements, resolving the contradiction between simple processing and foreground integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The foreground mask is generated in advance before the inpainting process. This preliminary action identifies protected regions ahead of time, allowing the inpainting algorithm to avoid distorting foreground elements. The preliminary mask generation adds minimal complexity while ensuring foreground integrity throughout the inpainting process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12406342B2Systems and methods for performing inpainting
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 CANVA PTY LTD
  • US12406342B2 patent drawing
  • US12406342B2 patent drawing
  • US12406342B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described embodiments generally relate to a computer-implemented method for performing inpainting. The method includes accessing a first image; receiving a selected area of the first image; identifying a foreground area of the first image; generating a merged mask based on the union of the user selected area and the foreground area; performing an inpainting process on the area of the first image corresponding to the merged mask to generate a second image, being an inpainted image; generating a reduced mask based on the user selected area reduced by the foreground area; and combining the first image with the area of the second image corresponding to the reduced mask to produce an output image.