Forestry Machine Cabin Hazard Detection for Moving Trunk Intrusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Forestry machine operators face safety risks due to potential collisions with moving tree trunks or other objects that may intrude into the cabin, as existing systems rely on operator observation and do not provide automatic detection and response.

Innovation Solution

A control method and system using sensors and control units to detect objects within a predetermined area around the cabin, determining the object's location, speed, and direction of travel, and automatically adjusting the forestry machine's operation to prevent collisions by slowing down or stopping the machinery if necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automatic sensor-based detection system is implemented, then operator safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection area is segmented into multiple predetermined sectors radiating from the cabin, allowing the sensor system to focus on specific zones rather than monitoring the entire environment uniformly. This segmentation enables more efficient object detection and tracking while reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A control unit acts as an intermediary between the sensor and the forestry machine's control system. The control unit processes sensor data, determines object trajectories, and automatically adjusts machine operation, thereby simplifying the integration of safety features without requiring direct complex connections between all system components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If operator observation is used for hazard detection, then device complexity is reduced, but response time and safety are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection system complexityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The manual observation system is replaced with an automated sensor-based detection system that continuously monitors the environment around the cabin. This substitution eliminates human reaction time limitations and provides immediate automated response to potential hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-monitoring and self-adjustment by automatically detecting objects, calculating their trajectories, and controlling the forestry machine's operation without requiring operator intervention. The control system serves itself by making real-time safety decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12259089B2Control arrangement and method for controlling a forestry machine
Publication Date: 2025.03.25 PONSSE OY
  • US12259089B2 patent drawing
  • US12259089B2 patent drawing
  • US12259089B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control arrangement includes at least one sensor. The sensor is adapted to detect at least one object in an area of at least one predefined sector focused in an area between a control cabin and a boom end, and to detect at least one of: location information of the detected object at two different time instants, at least, and the speed of the detected object. The control arrangement additionally includes at least one control unit adapted to determine at least the direction of travel of the detected object in relation to the control cabin at two different time instants, at least, based on the detected location information and/or the detected speed of the object, and cause a change in the control of a forest machine responsive to the detected direction of movement of the detected object being directed towards the control cabin in the area of the sector.