Forged Aluminum Sputtering Targets With Uniform Grain and Texture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aluminum and aluminum alloy sputtering targets face challenges such as cast defects, non-uniform grain sizes, and texture banding due to mechanical rolling processes, which can lead to inconsistent sputtering properties.

Innovation Solution

A method involving frictionless forging followed by rolling and heat treatment is employed to produce sputtering targets with uniform grain sizes and textures, using graphite as a lubricant to reduce friction and achieve homogeneous deformation, resulting in a microstructure with minimal texture banding and consistent grain size distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If standard casting followed by significant rolling is used to process aluminum sputtering targets, then manufacturing complexity is reduced, but the grain size uniformity and texture homogeneity deteriorate due to cast defects and texture banding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidgrain size uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies frictionless forging by changing the processing parameter from conventional rolling to frictionless forging, which fundamentally alters the deformation mechanism. This parameter change eliminates the texture banding and grain size non-uniformity issues inherent in rolling processes while maintaining manufacturing feasibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces graphite as a friction-reducing intermediary between the billet and press plates during forging. This intermediary enables frictionless forging conditions, allowing uniform deformation throughout the billet without the defects associated with conventional rolling, thereby achieving both ease of manufacture and high precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If conventional rolling is used to reduce billet height, then processing time is reduced, but texture banding and non-uniform deformation occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoidtexture homogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental processing parameter from rolling to frictionless forging, which achieves rapid height reduction similar to rolling but with uniform deformation throughout the material. This parameter change eliminates texture banding while maintaining efficient processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Graphite sheets are introduced as a friction-reducing intermediary that enables the forging process to proceed rapidly without creating the non-uniform deformation and texture banding associated with conventional rolling, thus achieving both speed and uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If frictionless forging is used to achieve uniform deformation, then grain size uniformity is improved, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrain size uniformityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses graphite sheets as a simple, easily implementable intermediary that enables frictionless forging. This approach achieves uniform grain size and eliminates texture banding without requiring complex equipment modifications, as graphite is a readily available and easy-to-apply friction reducer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements frictionless forging by changing the friction parameter at the interface between billet and press plates. This parameter change achieves superior grain uniformity through a relatively simple process modification rather than requiring complex manufacturing systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method effectively eliminates defects like feather grains and texture banding, producing sputtering targets with uniform grain sizes and textures, enhancing their sputtering properties and manufacturing consistency.

Implementation Method 1

placing a sheet of graphite at an interface between an aluminum or aluminum alloy billet and press plates of a forging press; forging the aluminum or aluminum alloy billet to at least a 50% reduction in height with the forging press

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLubrication: Lubrication

Implementation Method 2

heat treating the reduced aluminum or aluminum alloy billet at a temperature of 250°C -300°C for 1 to 2 hours to form a sputtering target characterized as having an average grain size between 15 μm and 55 μm and characterized by a microstructure having a random texture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 3

heat treating the reduced aluminum or aluminum alloy billet at a temperature of 250°C -300°C for 1 to 2 hours to form a sputtering target characterized as having an average grain size between 15 μm and 55 μm and characterized by a microstructure having a random texture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRecrystallization:

Data Source

PatentEP3332049B1Frictionless forged aluminum alloy sputtering target with improved properties
Publication Date: 2021.06.16 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • EP3332049B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3332049B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3332049B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A sputtering target comprising a forged aluminum material having an average grain size between about 15 and 55 microns. The aluminum material has at least one of the following: a homogeneous texture with minimal texture banding as measured by banding factor B below about 0.01; a texture gradient H of less than 0.2; or either weak (200) texture or near random texture characterized by maximum intensity of inverse pole figure less than 3 times random in multiple directions.