Forged Crankshaft Stability During Coining Process

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for manufacturing forged crankshafts with recessed arms face challenges in maintaining stability during the coining process due to excess protruding portions, leading to potential twisting and instability, which complicates the application of desired forces for shaping.

Innovation Solution

A forged crankshaft manufacturing apparatus and method that includes a retaining device to maintain the forged blank in a specified posture and a moving device to ensure the excess portions are bent or crashed uniformly, preventing twisting and ensuring stable deformation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If excess portions are left on the forged blank for weight reduction, then the crankshaft weight is reduced, but the stability during coining process deteriorates causing twisting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrankshaft weightVSAvoidstability during coining process
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The excess portions are removed before the coining process to prevent instability and twisting during shaping. This preliminary removal of material that would cause problems during subsequent operations resolves the contradiction by enabling both weight reduction and process stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing process is divided into distinct stages: trimming to remove excess portions, followed by coining for final shaping. This segmentation allows each operation to be optimized independently, with trimming preparing the blank for stable coining while still achieving weight reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Shape

If force is applied to bend or crash excess portions, then the desired shape is achieved, but twisting occurs due to instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape of crank armVSAvoidaccuracy in shape formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Excess portions are removed before the coining operation, eliminating the source of instability that would cause twisting when force is applied. This preliminary preparation ensures that subsequent shaping forces produce accurate results without distortion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The excess portions that would cause harm (instability and twisting) are converted into a benefit by removing them in advance, allowing the coining process to proceed with stable, precise force application that achieves the desired shape accurately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Weight of moving object

If coining is performed on forged blank with excess portions, then weight reduction is achieved, but the process complexity increases due to instability control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrankshaft weightVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process is segmented into trimming (removing excess portions) followed by coining (final shaping). This separation simplifies each individual operation by eliminating the need to control instability during coining, reducing overall process complexity while maintaining weight reduction benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The trimming operation is performed as a preliminary step to remove excess portions before coining. This preliminary action eliminates the need for complex instability control mechanisms during the coining process, simplifying the overall manufacturing process while achieving weight reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus and method enable stable processing of excess portions, maintaining the crankshaft's stability and accuracy in shape formation, thereby preventing twisting and ensuring a correctly formed crankshaft with reduced weight and assured stiffness.

Implementation Method 1

a first die and a second die paired with each other, which bend or crash the excess portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 2

a retaining device that retains at least one of the rough journals or at least one of the rough pins of the forged blank such that a rough pin decentering direction in which the rough pins are decentered from the rough journals is perpendicular to a reducing direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

a moving device that supports the retaining device such that the retaining device is movable along the reducing direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS10875083B2Apparatus and method for manufacturing forged crankshaft
Publication Date: 2020.12.29 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
  • US10875083B2 patent drawing
  • US10875083B2 patent drawing
  • US10875083B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A forged crankshaft manufacturing apparatus processes a forged blank with no flash. The forged blank includes at least one rough crank arm having an excess portion protruding from an outer periphery of a side portion thereof. The manufacturing apparatus includes a first die and a second die paired with each other, a retaining device, and a moving device. The first die and the second die bend or crash the excess portion. The retaining device retains at least one of the rough journals or at least one of the rough pins such that a rough pin decentering direction is perpendicular to a reducing direction in which the first die and the second die apply force for reduction. The moving device supports the retaining device such that the retaining device is movable in the reducing direction.