Forged Crankshaft Preforming to Reduce Weight and Yield Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for producing forged crankshafts with reduced weight and sufficient stiffness face challenges in forming recesses on the journal-side surface, requiring significant force and complex mechanisms, and do not effectively address weight reduction while minimizing yield loss due to excessive flash generation.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a preforming step to create a preformed blank with excess projecting portions, followed by a die forging step using a second die to increase the thickness of the crank arm side portions and form a recess, and a trimming step to remove flash, allowing for the production of a forged crankshaft with reduced weight and sufficient stiffness without requiring excessive force or complex mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If a recess is formed on the journal-side surface of the crank arm to reduce weight, then weight reduction is achieved, but significant force and complex mechanisms are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrankshaft weightVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The preforming step creates excess projecting portions on the crank arm before die forging, preparing the material distribution in advance. This preliminary action allows the subsequent die forging to simply redistribute the material to form the recess, avoiding the need for complex punching mechanisms while achieving weight reduction through the recess formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional die forging is used to form the crankshaft, then the crankshaft structure is formed, but excessive flash is generated resulting in yield loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrankshaft formationVSAvoidmaterial yield
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The preforming step pre-distributes the material volume along the longitudinal direction and creates the basic crankshaft shape with excess projecting portions. This preliminary shaping reduces the amount of material that would otherwise flow out as flash during die forging, thereby minimizing yield loss while still achieving the required crankshaft structure formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The excess projecting portions are created at specific locations on the crank arm where material is needed. During die forging, this localized material distribution control ensures that material flows only where required to form the recess and thick side portions, rather than generating excessive flash around the entire crankshaft periphery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If the side portions of the crank arm are made thick to ensure stiffness, then stiffness is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrankarm stiffnessVSAvoidcrankshaft weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The recess is formed specifically on the journal-side surface of the crank arm while maintaining thick side portions at the locations where stiffness is required. This localized material redistribution allows weight reduction through the recess without compromising the structural stiffness provided by the thick side portions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The preforming step creates excess projecting portions that are strategically positioned to allow subsequent die forging to form the recess while preserving material at the side portions. This preliminary material distribution enables the final structure to have both weight reduction and sufficient stiffness simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables the production of forged crankshafts with reduced weight and maintained stiffness, improving yield by minimizing flash formation and simplifying the process, while avoiding the need for high force application and complex mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

a preforming step of forming a preformed blank with no flash... a die forging step of forming a forged blank with flash by pressing the preformed blank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy: Heating

Implementation Method 2

by the first dies the excess projecting portions of the crank arm are deformed so as to increase the side portions of the crank arm in thickness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10350671B2Method for producing a forged crankshaft
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
  • US10350671B2 patent drawing
  • US10350671B2 patent drawing
  • US10350671B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for producing a forged crankshaft includes: a preforming step of forming a preformed blank with no flash, the preformed blank including a shape of the crankshaft, wherein the crank arm have excess projecting portions at an outer peripheries of side portions of the crank arm near the crank pin; a die forging step of forming a forged blank with flash by pressing the preformed blank with a pair of first dies; and a trimming step of removing the flash from the forged blank. In the die forging step, while a second die is abutted against a journal-side surface of the crank arm and holds the surface, the excess projecting portions of the crank arm are deformed by the first dies so as to increase the side portions of the crank arm in thickness.