Forged Part Traceability Across Heat Treatment and Sandblasting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge of tracing forged parts throughout their production process, including forging, sandblasting, heat treatment, and mechanical processing, is hindered by high thermal stress, surface scaling, and impurities, which prevent consistent optical tracing and affect mechanical properties, and the non-sequential nature of process steps complicates continuous identification.

Innovation Solution

A method involving capturing process parameters and applying first and further identifiers using mechanical or thermal penetrant and surface inscription methods, respectively, to ensure traceability, with identifiers generated in regions that endure process stresses or are minimally affected, and storing these in a database for retrieval.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If optical identification methods are used during forging process, then traceability is improved, but the high thermal stress and surface scaling prevent consistent identification

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetraceabilityVSAvoidthermal stress and surface scaling
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The identification process is segmented into two distinct phases: first, a penetrant identifier is applied during forging when the workpiece is hot; second, a surface identifier is applied after cooling and scaling removal. This segmentation allows each identifier to be applied under appropriate conditions, ensuring both traceability and surface quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first identifier is applied preliminarily during the forging process itself, while the workpiece is still hot and malleable. This preliminary action ensures the identifier is embedded before scaling occurs, guaranteeing traceability even though the surface will later be altered by scaling and subsequent processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If penetrant marking methods are used during forging, then identification is achieved, but mechanical properties of the workpiece surface are negatively affected

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveidentificationVSAvoidmechanical properties of workpiece surface
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The identification system is divided into two independent marking methods applied at different times: penetrant marking during forging (when material properties are less critical) and surface inscription after forging (when mechanical properties are finalized). This segmentation ensures that the penetrant marking does not compromise final mechanical properties, as the critical surface layer is restored or treated afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The penetrant identifier is applied locally during forging when the material is in a state that allows embedding without compromising overall mechanical properties. The subsequent surface treatment or inscription is applied locally to restore or enhance surface quality in the critical load-bearing areas, while preserving the embedded identifier for traceability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If continuous optical tracing is attempted through all process steps, then complete traceability is improved, but the non-sequential nature of process steps and temporary storage make this impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplete traceabilityVSAvoidcontinuous tracing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of attempting continuous optical tracing through all process steps, the system uses identifiers that are copied or transferred between stages. The first identifier (penetrant) is embedded during forging and can be read later; if damaged or illegible, a second identifier (surface inscription) is created as a copy or supplement. This copying approach simplifies the tracing system by allowing discontinuous reading points rather than requiring continuous optical tracking through storage and parallel processing stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures traceability of forged parts through the entire production process, maintaining mechanical integrity and enabling identification of defective products by linking identifiers to process parameters, reducing data storage needs, and optimizing production efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

Marking the workpiece produced in the forging process with a first identifier by means of a mechanical or thermal penetrant method

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical penetration:

Implementation Method 2

Marking the workpiece produced in the forging process with a first identifier by means of a mechanical or thermal penetrant method

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal penetration:

Implementation Method 3

Marking the workpiece produced in the subsequent process step with a further identifier by means of a surface inscription method

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface inscription:

Implementation Method 4

the scaling is removed by means of methods for the mechanical and/or thermal removal of material, for example by sandblasting or shot peening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 5

the surface of the workpiece is processed by a heat treatment such as case hardening, carbonitriding or quenching and tempering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 6

the surface of the workpiece is processed by a heat treatment such as case hardening, carbonitriding or quenching and tempering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCase hardening: Case Hardening

Implementation Method 7

the surface of the workpiece is processed by a heat treatment such as case hardening, carbonitriding or quenching and tempering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCarbonitriding: Carbonitriding

Data Source

PatentUS12607991B2Method for tracing forged parts over the entire production process, in particular from the forging process, via sandblasting and heat treatment, to mechanical processing
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 SMS GROUP GMBH
  • US12607991B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Tracing forged parts over their production process includes: capturing process parameters of a forging process; marking a workpiece with a first identifier; storing the captured process parameters and the first identifier in a database; reading the identifier from the workpiece produced in the previous process step; capturing process parameters during subsequent process steps; storing the process parameters of the subsequent process steps in the database for the read identifier, if legibility of the first identifier of the workpiece remains during the subsequent process step; marking the workpiece produced in the subsequent process step with a further identifier, if legibility of the first identifier of the workpiece does not remain during the subsequent process step of the production process; and storing the process parameters of the subsequent process step together with the further identifier and process parameters of the previous process steps and the first identifier in the database.