Forged Aluminum Wheel Forming for Material Homogeneity and Densification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for manufacturing forged aluminum wheels face challenges in homogenizing materials, optimizing flowability, preventing material burning on molds, and densifying the internal structure, which affect the mechanical properties and manufacturing efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A manufacturing method involving preheating aluminum billets and molds to specific temperature ranges, followed by two stages of hot forging and flow forming, with intermediate machining steps to ensure uniformity and densification, and applying forced rolling to enhance structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional single-stage forging is used, then manufacturing process is simple, but material homogeneity and flowability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial homogeneityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The forging process is divided into two distinct stages: first hot forging to create a preform with improved material distribution, then second hot forging to achieve final shape with optimized flowability. This segmentation allows each stage to address specific material characteristics separately, achieving superior homogeneity that single-stage forging cannot provide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first hot forging stage performs preliminary shaping and material redistribution before the final forging stage. By pre-establishing a more homogeneous material structure in the preform, the second forging stage can achieve better flowability and densification without requiring excessive complexity in the overall process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If high temperature is applied during forging, then material flowability improves, but material burning on mold occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial flowabilityVSAvoidmaterial burning
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The process utilizes temperature parameter changes between stages: first hot forging at higher temperature to maximize flowability and material distribution, then controlled cooling followed by second hot forging at optimized temperature. This dynamic parameter adjustment allows achieving good flowability while preventing material burning on the mold during the final shaping stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The periodic heating and controlled cooling cycles between the two forging stages allow the material to maintain optimal temperature characteristics for each operation. The material is heated for flowability, then cooled slightly to reduce burning risk, then reheated for final forming, creating a periodic temperature action pattern that balances flowability with prevention of harmful burning effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Manufacturing precision

If material is densely forged, then internal structure improves, but manufacturing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinternal structure densificationVSAvoidmanufacturing cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The densification process is segmented into two forging stages with intermediate cooling and machining. The first stage achieves partial densification and material redistribution, the intermediate machining removes defects and prepares the surface, and the second stage completes the densification. This segmentation allows efficient progress toward densification without requiring excessively long continuous forging time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first hot forging stage performs preliminary densification and material consolidation before the intermediate machining step. By pre-densifying the material structure in the first stage, the second stage requires less time to achieve final densification, reducing overall manufacturing time while maintaining high internal structure quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If flow forming is performed without preheating, then manufacturing efficiency is high, but material uniformity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidmaterial uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The second hot forging stage performs preliminary uniformity optimization by redistributing material and eliminating temperature gradients before the flow forming operation. This preliminary action ensures that when flow forming begins, the material already has improved uniformity, allowing the subsequent flow forming to maintain material consistency without requiring extended preheating time, thus preserving manufacturing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method achieves homogenization, improved flowability, reduced material burning, and increased strength and rigidity of the aluminum wheel by ensuring uniform material distribution and densification, resulting in a product with enhanced mechanical properties and manufacturing efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

preheating aluminum billets and molds to specific temperature ranges

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

two stages of hot forging

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 3

densify the internal structure of a forged aluminum wheel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 4

applying forced rolling to enhance structural integrity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12115575B2Method of manufacturing of forged aluminum wheel
Publication Date: 2024.10.15 ST ENTER CO LTD
  • US12115575B2 patent drawing
  • US12115575B2 patent drawing
  • US12115575B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a manufacturing method of an aluminum forging wheel, the manufacturing method being able to homogenize a material, optimize flow ability, prevent picking inside a wheel, and densify the internal structure of an aluminum forging wheel. The manufacturing method of an aluminum forging wheel includes: a billet preparation step S1 of preparing an aluminum billet to manufacture an aluminum forging wheel; a first forming step S2 of manufacturing a primary forming product by performing hot forging on the billet prepared in the billet preparation step S1; a second forming step S3 of manufacturing an aluminum forging wheel that is a secondary forming product by performing hot forging on the primary forming product manufactured in the first forming step S2; and a second machining step S5 of preheating the aluminum forging wheel manufactured in the first forming step S3 and performing F/F.