Fork Carriage Assembly with Variable Reinforcement Bar

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high cost of designing and producing hot rolling dies for manufacturing fork-supporting members with different profiles for materials handling vehicles, which limits the economical production of fork carriages capable of supporting various fork sizes and loads.

Innovation Solution

A method involving an H-shaped fork-supporting bar with differently sized fork-receiving hooks and a reinforcement bar welded to provide structural reinforcement, allowing the same die to produce fork carriages for supporting forks of different sizes and loads by varying the position and size of the reinforcement bar and using fillet welds for enhanced strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a specifically designed hot rolling die is used to manufacture fork-supporting members with different profiles, then the structural integrity and load-bearing capacity are improved, but the manufacturing cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

A single hot rolling die is designed to produce fork-supporting members with multiple different profiles by varying the positioning and size of reinforcement bars. The die can accommodate different reinforcement bar configurations (positions, sizes, orientations) to create fork-supporting members suitable for different fork sizes and load requirements, eliminating the need for multiple specialized dies while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Reinforcement bars are strategically positioned at specific locations along the fork-supporting bar based on the required load-bearing capacity and fork size. The reinforcement bars can be placed at different positions (e.g., near the fork-receiving hook, along the length of the bar) and in different configurations to provide localized strengthening where needed, allowing a single die to produce varied profiles with appropriate local reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple hot rolling dies are designed for different fork sizes and loads, then the adaptability and versatility of fork carriages are improved, but the device complexity and production cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefork size compatibilityVSAvoiddie variety
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hot rolling die is designed as a universal tool that can produce fork-supporting members for different fork sizes and load capacities. By incorporating variable reinforcement bar configurations within the same die design, the system achieves multi-functionality, allowing a single die to replace multiple specialized dies while maintaining adaptability to different application requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The die design incorporates the ability to vary parameters such as reinforcement bar position, size, and orientation to produce different fork-supporting member profiles. These parameter changes within a single die system enable the production of diverse fork carriages suitable for different fork sizes and loads without increasing die complexity or quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces manufacturing costs by utilizing a single hot rolling die to produce fork carriages that can support a range of fork sizes and loads, enhancing structural integrity and rigidity while accommodating various fork sizes and loads efficiently.

Implementation Method 1

Coupling the reinforcement bar to the fork-supporting bar may comprise welding the reinforcement bar to the first side of the fork-supporting bar opposite the second side near the one fork-receiving hook

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWelding: Welding

Implementation Method 2

Coupling may further comprise making a first fillet weld between a side surface of the reinforcement bar and an upper corner of the fork-supporting bar. Coupling may further comprise making a second fillet weld between a bottom surface of the reinforcement bar and a lower side surface and a lower corner of the fork-supporting bar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFillet weld: Welding

Data Source

PatentEP3160893B1Carriage assembly for materials handling vehicle and method for making same
Publication Date: 2019.04.03 CROWN EQUIP CORP
  • EP3160893B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3160893B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3160893B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method is provided for manufacturing a fork carriage comprising: providing a fork-supporting bar having first and second fork-receiving hooks, wherein the second hook is of a larger size than the first hook; based on a size of one or more forks desired to be mounted on the fork-supporting bar, positioning the bar such that one of the first and second fork-receiving hooks corresponding to the size of the one or more forks is located outwardly to receive the one or more forks on the one fork-receiving hook; and coupling a reinforcement bar to a side of the fork-supporting bar opposite the side near the one fork-receiving hook. A carriage assembly comprising a fork carriage including an upper member comprising a fork-supporting bar having an outer fork-receiving hook and a reinforcement bar is also provided.