Fork-Carrier Visibility and Securing Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fork-carriers on telehandlers obstruct the operator's visibility of the prongs' position relative to the load, making it difficult to correctly insert the forks, leading to inconvenient and inefficient maneuvers during load pickup.

Innovation Solution

The design features a supporting frame with inclined transversal plates and parallel uprights, reducing non-visible intervals, allowing greater tilting and easier adjustment, and replacing chains with brackets for secure positioning, enhancing visibility and ease of use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a thick upper tubular crosspiece is used in the fork-carrier structure, then structural strength is improved, but operator visibility of the prongs' position relative to the load deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidoperator visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The upper crosspiece is segmented into multiple thinner tubular elements arranged in a specific pattern, replacing the single thick crosspiece. This segmentation maintains structural strength through distributed support while reducing the continuous obstruction to the operator's view of the prongs and load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The crosspiece structure uses asymmetric arrangement of tubular elements with varying diameters and positions, creating openings and gaps that strategically improve visibility in critical areas while maintaining strength where most needed. The asymmetric design allows optimized visibility corridors to the load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Volume of moving object

If chains are used for securing the prongs in the tilted configuration, then the accessory size is reduced during transport, but the ease of operation and securing reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessory size during transportVSAvoidease of securing
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The chain-based securing system is replaced with a mechanical locking system using pins, clips, or latches that engage with dedicated receptacles on the crosspiece. This substitution provides more reliable securing with simpler operation, eliminating the need for manual chain manipulation while maintaining compact transport configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The new securing mechanism incorporates self-locking features or spring-loaded elements that automatically engage when the prongs are positioned in the tilted configuration, reducing manual intervention required. The system self-secures the prongs in the transport position without requiring operator effort to tighten or adjust chains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3683184B1Apparatus for self-propelled operating machine
Publication Date: 2024.03.27 MANITOU ITALIA SRL
  • EP3683184B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3683184B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3683184B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Described is an apparatus (2) for a self-propelled operating machine (10) comprising a supporting frame (21, 22, 23) designed to be fastened at the rear to an attaching device wherein an operating arm (102) of the machine (10) is provided and designed to be coupled at the front to a tool (3). The frame includes two lateral uprights (21, 22) joined at the top by a transversal plate (23).