Telescopic Fork Suspension Lockout With Automatic Pin Engagement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing suspension locking devices for vehicles require multiple operators for synchronization, are complex, unreliable, and not adjustable, making them difficult to use and ineffective for different types of suspension-protection assemblies.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle suspension locking system with a telescopic fork suspension and fork protector, featuring a first assembly with a capture hook and a second assembly with a locking finger, utilizing return means to automatically lock and unlock the suspension based on the movement of telescopic tubes, allowing for adjustable locking and unlocking without manual synchronization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If prior suspension locking devices are used, then the suspension can be locked, but multiple operators are required for synchronization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidnumber of operators required
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system uses the rider's own weight and suspension movement to automatically trigger the locking mechanism. When the rider applies downward force on the suspension, the first assembly moves relative to the second assembly, automatically engaging the locking element without requiring any additional operator action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The locking element is pre-positioned in the second assembly and automatically projects when the suspension is compressed. The geometry of the first and second assemblies is designed so that the locking action occurs automatically as a result of the suspension's downward movement, eliminating the need for synchronized manual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If prior suspension locking devices are used, then the suspension can be locked, but perfect synchronization between operators is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking reliabilityVSAvoidsynchronization difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the suspension's own movement to trigger the locking mechanism. The relative motion between the first assembly (attached to suspension) and second assembly (attached to fork guard) automatically activates the locking element, eliminating the need for external synchronization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism is designed to be dynamic rather than static. The locking element projects automatically in response to the suspension's compression, making the locking action dependent on the actual suspension movement rather than requiring precise timing from multiple operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If prior suspension locking devices are used, then the suspension can be locked, but the devices are not adjustable for different suspension types

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadjustabilityVSAvoiddesign simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system is designed to adapt to the dynamic characteristics of different suspension types. The first assembly moves with the suspension while the second assembly remains fixed to the fork guard, allowing the mechanism to automatically adjust to different suspension travel and compression characteristics without requiring mechanical reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism is designed with universal applicability to different suspension types. The relative motion-based triggering mechanism works with various suspension configurations, and the system can be adapted to different fork guard geometries while maintaining the same fundamental locking principle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If prior suspension locking devices are used, then the suspension can be locked, but the devices are complex with difficult-to-machine parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system is divided into two separate assemblies: the first assembly attached to the suspension and the second assembly attached to the fork guard. This segmentation allows each component to be manufactured independently using simpler processes, avoiding the need for complex integrated parts that are difficult to machine.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism uses simple geometric shapes and forms that can be easily replicated through standard manufacturing processes. The first and second assemblies use basic mechanical forms that are straightforward to machine, avoiding complex geometries that would increase manufacturing difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides a versatile, reliable, and simple design that automatically locks and unlocks the suspension, ensuring optimal performance across various suspension types by using elastic return means to facilitate smooth operation.

Implementation Method 1

a first elastic return means configured to be stressed in compression by the movement of the locking finger from the retracted position to the locking position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a second elastic return means being provided for returning the holding member to the release position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4363299B1Suspension lockout system for a vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.08.06 LIDÉE MOTEUR (100 00)
  • EP4363299B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4363299B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4C
  • EP4363299B1 patent drawingFigure 5A~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a suspension lockout system (1) intended to be used on a vehicle comprising a telescopic fork suspension and at least one fork protector (P), comprising a first assembly (2) comprising a catch hook (7), and a second assembly (3) comprising a locking pin (47) and a stationary support (17), the system being characterised in that the second assembly (3) also comprises a first elastic return means (53) configured to be subjected to compression by the movement of the locking pin (47) and a holding member (28) which is translationally movable relative to the locking pin (47), since a second elastic return means (44) of the holding member (28) is provided, and in that the catch hook (7) has a ramp (13).