Automated Fork Positioning for Multi-Pallet Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial vehicles face inefficiencies in load handling operations due to sequential manual steps requiring additional time and effort, and existing automated systems have limited interaction with human operators, leading to inefficient transitions between automated and manual tasks.

Innovation Solution

A load handling system for industrial vehicles equipped with forks to support multiple pallets, a lifting system, and a traction system, controlled by a vehicle controller that enables automated mode operations such as moving forks between pallets and adjusting pallet positions for efficient handling and separation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated load handling operations are implemented, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload handling efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated load handling system is segmented into distinct functional modules: a vehicle controller for high-level decision making, a lift actuator for vertical movement control, and a traction actuator for horizontal movement control. Each module operates independently but coordinates through standardized communication protocols, allowing the system to achieve complex automated functionality while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of time

If sequential manual steps are used for load handling, then ease of operation is maintained, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational timeVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-positioning the vehicle and forks under the pallet before initiating the lift sequence. The vehicle controller pre-coordinates the lift and traction actuators to prepare for simultaneous or sequential operation, reducing the total time required for load handling while maintaining operational simplicity through automated sequencing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system eliminates idle time between manual operations by continuously coordinating lift and traction actions. The vehicle controller maintains continuous monitoring and adjustment of both actuators throughout the load handling process, ensuring that no time is wasted between steps while the operator simply activates the automated sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If automated mode is activated, then productivity increases, but ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle controller serves as an intermediary between the operator and the complex automated functions. The operator interacts with a simple activation interface, while the vehicle controller automatically manages the coordination of lift and traction actuators, handles safety monitoring, and manages the transition between manual and automated modes, thereby hiding system complexity from the operator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If multiple actuators are coordinated for automated operation, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload handling speedVSAvoidactuator coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the control functions of multiple actuators into a single vehicle controller that manages both the lift actuator and traction actuator through unified coordination logic. This consolidation reduces the overall system complexity by eliminating the need for separate control systems while maintaining the productivity benefits of coordinated multi-actuator operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3266673B1Automated load handling for industrial vehicle
Publication Date: 2020.08.26 HYSTER YALE GROUP INC
  • EP3266673B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3266673B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3266673B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A load handling system for a vehicle includes a set of forks (165) that concurrently supports two or more pallets (161,162) including a first pallet (161) and a second pallet (162) linearly positioned along a length of the forks (165), and a lifting system to raise and lower the forks. A traction system (270) moves the vehicle in a direction of travel associated with withdrawing the forks from the pallets. Additionally, an actuation device generates an activation signal in response to being actuated by an operator, and a vehicle controller places the vehicle in an automated mode of operation in response to receiving the activation signal. In the automated mode of operation, a front end of the forks (165) moves from the second pallet to the first pallet (161), and the first pallet (161) is raised while the second pallet remains on a transport surface. The first pallet (161) is then spaced apart from the second pallet (162) by a predetermined distance and then lowered to the transport surface.