Fork Holder Support Tilt Mechanism With Vertical Linear Actuator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing forklift fork support systems face challenges with large actuator sizes and power requirements, limited space utilization, and the need for reliable, easily replaceable components.

Innovation Solution

A novel apparatus using linear electric actuators and innovative frame connections, such as guiding and sliding means, allows for compact and efficient operation of fork supports with reduced power requirements, enabling tilt and lateral translation of forks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If conventional actuators with comparable force are used to achieve fork tilt movement, then the required force is sufficient, but the actuator size becomes too large and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator forceVSAvoidactuator size
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reorients the actuator from a horizontal mounting configuration to a vertical mounting configuration. This dimensional change allows the actuator to be positioned within the vertical space of the fork support structure, dramatically reducing the horizontal space requirements and allowing standard-sized actuators to be used without increasing overall system footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a dynamic connection mechanism between the actuator and the fork support structure, allowing the actuator to move from a fixed horizontal position to a vertical position during operation. This dynamic reconfiguration enables the system to achieve the required tilt movement while maintaining compact dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If conventional fork support structures are used, then structural stability is maintained, but space utilization is limited and structure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidspace utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a nested configuration where the actuator is vertically positioned within the fork support structure's existing vertical space. The actuator rod moves within the confines of the support structure, effectively nesting the actuating mechanism within the available space rather than requiring additional external space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The fork support structure is divided into distinct functional segments: the vertical support column, the horizontal fork carrier, and the vertically mounted actuator. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently for its specific function while maintaining overall structural stability and compact space utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If complex actuator systems are implemented to achieve precise fork control, then control precision is improved, but device complexity and power requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical linkage systems with a direct-acting linear actuator mounted vertically. The actuator's rod connects directly to the fork support, eliminating the need for complex intermediate mechanical linkages, gears, or cam mechanisms while maintaining precise control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the essential function of fork tilting from a complex multi-component mechanical system and isolates it to a single linear actuator. By removing unnecessary intermediate components and focusing on the core function, the system achieves precise control with reduced complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus optimizes space usage, reduces actuator force needs, and ensures a reliable, simple structure with standardized components, enhancing maneuverability and load handling efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The apparatus comprises first actuator means suitable for actuating, in rotation, the second frame with respect to the first frame. The first actuator means comprise at least one linear electric actuator of commercial type

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLinear electric actuator: Linear Motor

Implementation Method 2

The means for connecting the second frame to the first frame comprise guiding means and sliding means, configured for obtaining a substantially vertical arrangement of the first actuator means within the apparatus

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP4045454B1Apparatus for operating the fork holder suppors of a forklift
Publication Date: 2026.03.04 E80 GRP SPA
  • EP4045454B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4045454B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4045454B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An apparatus (1) for operating the fork holder supports of forks (2;2a,2b,2c,2d) of a manually or automatically driven forklift, comprising a first frame (4) slidable within a vertical upright of said forklift. The first frame comprises connection means (15) for a second frame (11), which supports the connection means, configured for allowing a rotation of the second frame with respect to the first frame, and first actuator means (8) for rotating the second frame with respect to the first frame. The connection means comprise guiding means (9, 10) and sliding means (12, 13), or a cam element (44), which allow a substantially vertical arrangement of the first actuator means within the apparatus; in addition, the first actuator means comprise at least one linear electric actuator of commercial type, or a trapezoidal screw actuator, or a worm screw actuator with recirculating ball nut.