Forked Dipole Antenna Shrouds for Beam Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional dual polarization dipole radiating elements in panel-type base station antennas face issues with beam width stability, interference between high and low frequency bands, cross-polarization, and poor isolation between adjacent elements, while also being costly and difficult to manufacture.

Innovation Solution

The design features a base station antenna with forked arms and shrouds surrounding high band radiating elements, configured to improve beam width stability, reduce interference, enhance cross-polarization, and increase isolation between adjacent elements, using a chassis with low and high band radiating elements arranged in a side-by-side configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional dual polarization dipole radiating elements are used in panel-type base station antennas, then the antennas can transmit and receive RF signals in multiple polarizations, but beam width stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedual polarization capabilityVSAvoidbeam width stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The dipole radiating element is divided into multiple separate dipole arms (first and second dipole arms for each polarization) instead of using a single integrated element. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each arm's geometry and positioning, enabling dual polarization functionality while maintaining stable beam width characteristics through precise control of each segment's contribution to the overall radiation pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each dipole arm is given specific local geometric characteristics (different lengths, orientations, and positions) tailored to its function. The first and second dipole arms have distinct local qualities that enable them to radiate in specific polarizations while maintaining overall beam width stability. This local differentiation allows optimization of each arm's radiation pattern to compensate for potential beam width variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If high band dipole radiating elements are included in multi-band antennas, then the antennas can operate in high frequency ranges, but resonance from high band elements creates interference with low band frequencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-band operationVSAvoidresonance interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The high band dipole radiating elements are physically extracted and positioned in separate columns away from the low band radiating elements. This spatial extraction removes the source of resonance interference from the low band operating region, allowing high band elements to resonate at their intended frequencies without creating harmful interference in the low band frequency range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The antenna structure transitions from a planar two-dimensional arrangement to a three-dimensional configuration with multiple columns and rows. High band elements are placed in separate columns at different spatial positions and orientations relative to low band elements. This dimensional separation in space and orientation prevents resonance coupling between bands while maintaining multi-band functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Volume of moving object

If multiple dipole radiating elements are arranged in close proximity in antennas, then the antenna structure becomes more compact, but isolation between adjacent radiating elements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantenna compactnessVSAvoidisolation between elements
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Adjacent radiating elements are separated not only in the horizontal plane but also in the vertical dimension and through angular orientation. Elements are arranged in multiple rows and columns with specific spacing and tilt angles, creating three-dimensional separation that maintains compact overall footprint while ensuring sufficient isolation between adjacent elements to prevent mutual coupling and interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The arrangement of radiating elements employs asymmetric positioning and orientation rather than uniform symmetric placement. Different rows and columns have elements at varying distances, angles, and heights from each other. This asymmetric configuration optimizes isolation between adjacent elements while maintaining compact dimensions, as each element's position is specifically tailored to minimize coupling with its neighbors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional dipole designs are used in base station antennas, then the antenna structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but cross-polarization performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcross-polarization interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The dipole structure is segmented into multiple arms with specific geometric configurations rather than using simple conventional single-element dipoles. Each arm is designed with precise dimensions and orientations to control the polarization characteristics. This segmentation enables better cross-polarization rejection while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standardized fabrication processes for each arm type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The geometric parameters of the dipole arms (lengths, widths, spacing, orientations) are optimized to specific values that improve cross-polarization performance. By carefully controlling these parameters, the radiation patterns achieve better polarization purity and cross-polarization isolation. These parameter optimizations can be implemented through standard manufacturing processes, balancing performance improvement with manufacturing ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9966664B2Low band and high band dipole designs for triple band antenna systems and related methods
Publication Date: 2018.05.08 RFS TECH INC
  • US9966664B2 patent drawing
  • US9966664B2 patent drawing
  • US9966664B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Multi-band antenna systems for communication systems are disclosed. An antenna system includes at least one low band dipole radiating element for radiating RF energy in a low frequency range and at least one group or column of high band dipole radiating assemblies for radiating RF energy in a high frequency range. The low band dipole radiating element may be constructed to provide improved control beam width stability of the high band dipole radiating assemblies and improved cross-polarization performance in the low frequency range. The high band dipole radiating assemblies include high band dipole radiating elements and shrouds surrounding the high band dipole radiating elements. The shrouds are configured to improve the beam width stability and cross-polarization of the high band dipole radiating elements, improve isolation between the high band dipole radiating elements and to shift resonance of the high band dipole radiating assemblies below the low frequency range.