Forked Puller Assembly for Axial Removal of Shouldered Components

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for removing components from devices, such as gas turbine engines, are not sufficiently improved to efficiently handle components with cylindrical portions and shoulders, requiring a more effective apparatus and method for extraction.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus comprising a base with mounts and a bridge, a forked flange puller, and a shaft with a threaded portion, where the forked flange abuts the component's shoulder, and the shaft is rotated to pull the component away from the device, utilizing a monolithic body construction and U-shaped geometry for secure engagement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing methods are used for removing components, then the removal process can be completed, but the efficiency and effectiveness are insufficient for components with cylindrical portions and shoulders

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent removal efficiencyVSAvoidease of component removal
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The puller is divided into distinct functional segments: a base for mounting, a puller body with forked flanges for engaging the component, and a shaft for applying extraction force. This segmentation allows each part to be optimized for its specific function, improving overall removal efficiency for cylindrical components with shoulders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The forked flanges act as intermediary elements that bridge the puller mechanism and the component's cylindrical portion. The flanges engage with the cylindrical surface and abut against the shoulder, providing a secure mechanical interface that enables effective force transmission during extraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a secure engagement mechanism is used to remove the component, then the removal becomes more effective, but the apparatus complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure engagementVSAvoidapparatus structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The base and puller body are merged into a single integrated structure with a U-shaped geometry. This combination provides structural stability and secure engagement in one component, reducing the need for additional separate parts while maintaining reliability during component extraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using complex locking mechanisms or multiple fastening elements, the design inverts the approach by using the component's own geometry (cylindrical portion and shoulder) as the engagement feature. The forked flanges simply need to match this geometry, simplifying the apparatus while ensuring secure engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables efficient and secure removal of components with cylindrical portions and shoulders from devices like gas turbine engines, enhancing the existing methods by providing a robust and effective mechanism for axial extraction.

Implementation Method 1

The shaft includes a threaded portion mated with a threaded aperture in the bridge. A distal end portion of the shaft is rotatably connected to the puller.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScrew mechanism: Screw

Implementation Method 2

The component is pulled axially, relative to the axis, away from the device by rotating a shaft about the axis.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Implementation Method 3

The puller includes a forked flange configured to abut against the shoulder of the component when the cylindrical portion of the component is within a channel of the forked flange.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS11241775B2Apparatuses and methods for removing a component
Publication Date: 2022.02.08 RTX CORP
  • US11241775B2 patent drawing
  • US11241775B2 patent drawing
  • US11241775B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus is provided for removing a component from a device, where the component includes a cylindrical portion and a shoulder adjacent the cylindrical portion. The apparatus includes a base, a puller and a shaft. The base includes a first mount, a second mount and a bridge extending between and connected to the first mount and the second mount. The first mount and the second mount are each configured to engage with the device. The puller includes a forked flange configured to abut against the shoulder of the component when the cylindrical portion of the component is within a channel of the forked flange. The shaft includes a threaded portion mated with a threaded aperture in the bridge. A distal end portion of the shaft is rotatably connected to the puller.