Forklift Impact Monitoring with Correlated Sensor Nodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Warehouses face costly damage and safety hazards due to forklift impacts with stationary objects, primarily caused by driver error, workplace design, and operational malfunctions, with existing systems failing to effectively monitor and analyze these events.

Innovation Solution

An impact monitoring system using stationary and mobile sensor nodes that detect and correlate data from collisions, generating alerts and providing analysis on impact patterns and trends to improve safety and reduce damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If forklifts are used to move goods in the warehouse, then productivity is improved, but the risk of impact damage to stationary objects and safety hazards increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegoods movement efficiencyVSAvoidimpact damage and safety hazards
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback by deploying sensor nodes on both mobile forklifts and stationary objects to detect impact events. When an impact is detected, the system immediately generates alerts to warehouse management, enabling timely intervention and corrective actions to prevent future incidents, thus reducing impact damage while maintaining forklift productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces sensor nodes as intermediary devices between forklifts and stationary objects. These sensors act as mediators that detect and report impact events, providing objective data about collisions without interfering with forklift operations, thereby enabling monitoring and reduction of harmful impacts while preserving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If impact monitoring systems are deployed to detect collisions, then safety and damage reduction are improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor network and data processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is segmented into independent sensor nodes that can be individually deployed on forklifts and stationary objects. Each sensor node operates autonomously to detect impacts, and the system processes data in modular units (individual impact events), reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high detection accuracy through distributed sensing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor nodes are designed with multi-functionality, serving both as impact detectors and as identifiers of mobile and stationary objects. The same sensor infrastructure supports multiple functions including impact detection, object identification, and pattern analysis, thereby reducing system complexity by eliminating the need for separate specialized components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If multiple sensor nodes are deployed to monitor both mobile and stationary objects, then impact detection precision is improved, but the quantity of sensors and system cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact event identification accuracyVSAvoidnumber of sensor nodes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the monitoring functions for mobile forklifts and stationary objects into a unified sensor network. By combining impact detection, object identification, and event correlation into a single integrated system, the patent achieves high measurement precision without requiring separate independent monitoring systems, thereby optimizing the quantity of sensors needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If impact data is collected and analyzed to identify patterns and trends, then safety management is improved, but data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety management effectivenessVSAvoiddata aggregation and analysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously collecting and pre-processing impact data in real-time as events occur. Impact events are immediately detected, recorded, and初步 analyzed, with patterns and trends identified progressively rather than through batch processing, thereby reducing data analysis time while improving safety management effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides timely alerts and data analysis to manage forklift impacts, reducing damage and enhancing warehouse safety by identifying high-risk operators and periods, thus optimizing operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the monitor may be configured to determine the same impact event on the basis of an acceleration characteristic detected by at least one of the multiple stationary sensor nodes and at least one of the one or more mobile sensor nodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration detection: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS20260065778A1Impact Monitoring System
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 MCCUE CORP
  • US20260065778A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065778A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065778A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for identifying operators requiring safety intervention in a warehouse environment includes providing a plurality of sensor nodes, the plurality of sensor nodes including a plurality of stationary sensor nodes and a plurality of mobile sensor nodes, affixing the plurality of stationary sensor nodes to stationary objects in the warehouse environment, affixing the plurality of mobile sensor nodes to mobile objects in the warehouse environment, each mobile sensor node being associated with a corresponding mobile object and operator, receiving, at a monitor over a time period, data from the plurality of sensor nodes characterizing a plurality of impact events, for each impact event of the plurality of impact events, correlating data from at least one stationary sensor node and at least one mobile sensor node to identify which mobile sensor node was involved in the impact event, aggregating the correlated data to determine, for each mobile sensor node, data characterizing impact events in which the mobile sensor node was involved during the time period, and identifying, based on the data characterizing impact events for the mobile sensor nodes, at least one operator is frequently involved in impact events.