Iterative Form Analytics via Field-Level Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current analytics implementations for on-line data forms lack the ability to track and analyze user interactions at the section or data-entry field level, making it difficult for forms developers to identify and address user input problems and improve form design effectively.

Innovation Solution

A data analytics application that receives and analyzes metrics such as selection duration, validation errors, and help feature access for data-entry fields, generating a distribution scale to highlight critical issues and facilitate iterative improvements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If generic analytics data collection is implemented, then overall web page visit tracking is achieved, but detailed data-entry field level analysis is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalytics data volumeVSAvoiddata-entry field level detail
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments analytics data collection into multiple hierarchical levels: form-level metrics (overall form performance), field-level metrics (individual data-entry field performance including selection duration, validation errors, and help feature access), and event-level metrics (specific user interactions). This segmentation enables simultaneous tracking of both aggregate statistics and granular field-level details without losing precision at any level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of information

If comprehensive analytics data is collected, then complete form performance information is obtained, but intuitive problem identification becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveform performance information completenessVSAvoidproblem identification ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs color-coded visual indicators to represent different levels of form performance and data-entry field issues. Critical problems are highlighted with distinct color markers, allowing developers to quickly identify problematic fields without manually analyzing raw data. The distribution scale uses color gradients to indicate severity levels, making comprehensive performance information intuitively interpretable at a glance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer that transforms raw analytics data into a standardized distribution scale format. This intermediary component aggregates field-level metrics, calculates performance scores, and presents results through a unified visual interface. The distribution scale acts as a mediator between comprehensive data collection and intuitive problem identification, converting detailed metrics into actionable insights.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If manual evaluation of analytics reports is required, then detailed analysis is possible, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveform design analysis accuracyVSAvoiddeveloper evaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated analysis capabilities that perform form performance evaluation without requiring manual developer intervention. The system automatically collects field-level metrics, identifies problematic data-entry fields through predefined criteria (such as excessive validation errors or prolonged selection duration), and generates prioritized improvement recommendations. This self-service approach maintains high analysis accuracy while eliminating time-consuming manual evaluation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes a feedback loop where analytics data automatically feeds into the distribution scale generation and problem identification processes. The system continuously monitors form performance, compares metrics against thresholds, and provides real-time feedback to developers about problematic fields. This automated feedback mechanism enables precise form design analysis to occur continuously without requiring manual developer time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10901585B2Iterative detection of forms-usage patterns
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 ADOBE INC
  • US10901585B2 patent drawing
  • US10901585B2 patent drawing
  • US10901585B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In embodiments of iterative detection of forms-usage patterns, a data analytics application can be implemented to receive analytics data associated with one or more data forms that each include data-entry fields displayed in a user interface, where the data-entry fields are designed for data entry, such as by a user of a computing device. The data analytics application can determine data-entry problems with the data-entry fields of the data forms based on the analytics data, as well as identify a critical data-entry problem with a data-entry field of a data form, the critical data-entry problem being identified as one of the determined data-entry problems. A distribution scale can be generated and displayed to depict the determined data-entry problems along with the critical data-entry problem. The data form can also be displayed in a preview mode with the analytics data displayed on the data form itself to indicate the data-entry problems.