Electronic Form Progress Prediction Using Field Complexity Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for tracking user progress in completing electronic processes, such as forms, lack accuracy due to factors not evident in automated analysis, leading to inefficient use of processor resources and ineffective support interventions.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning model is trained to predict completion percentages and times for electronic processes using user-specific and field-specific data, including complexity and proficiency, and is continuously improved through a feedback loop.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If existing techniques base determination primarily on total number of fields completed, then automation extent is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated progress trackingVSAvoidcompletion percentage accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the measurement parameters from simple field count to a weighted system incorporating field complexity scores and user proficiency levels. The machine learning model dynamically adjusts completion percentage calculations based on multiple parameters including field difficulty, user expertise, and actual time spent, thereby maintaining automation while significantly improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a machine learning model as an intermediary between raw user interaction data and completion percentage determination. This intermediary processes complex inputs including field complexity metadata, user profile information, and interaction patterns to generate accurate completion assessments, resolving the contradiction between automated processing and precise measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If automated analysis is used to track user progress, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to factors not evident in automated analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkload tracking efficiencyVSAvoidprogress monitoring accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback loops where the machine learning model continuously learns from actual user completion data to refine its predictions. The system compares predicted completion percentages with actual outcomes, using this feedback to improve future accuracy assessments. This enables automated tracking to maintain both high productivity and improving measurement precision over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis by pre-calculating field complexity scores and user proficiency levels before the actual completion process. This preparatory work enables the system to make more accurate real-time predictions during form completion, maintaining productivity while improving the precision of progress monitoring through pre-processed contextual information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If interventions are provided without accurate progress monitoring, then ease of operation is improved, but loss of information occurs due to ineffective interventions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport intervention provisionVSAvoiduser progress understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables targeted interventions by identifying specific fields or sections where users are struggling, rather than providing generic support. The machine learning model analyzes completion patterns at the field level, detecting anomalies such as excessive time spent on particular fields or repeated errors, and triggers localized interventions only where needed. This maintains ease of operation while preventing information loss by providing contextually appropriate support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12524606B2Predicting a completion percentage of an electronic process
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 INTUIT INC
  • US12524606B2 patent drawing
  • US12524606B2 patent drawing
  • US12524606B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure relate to assisting users in completing forms. Embodiments include retrieving data associated with a form comprising a total number of fields of the form and an indication of a level of complexity of a field of the form. Embodiments further include retrieving data associated with a user comprising a number of fields of the form the user has completed and an amount of time the user has spent completing a respective field of the form. Embodiments further include providing the data associated with the form and the data associated with the user to a machine learning model, and predicting an amount of user progress in completing the form, or a an amount of time required for the user to complete a given field of the form. Embodiments further include receiving the prediction from the machine learning model.