Form Response Interface for Online Content Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Online applications face inefficiencies in evaluating content posts due to the requirement for open-ended responses, leading to redundant listings and reduced participant engagement, as open-ended responses are less likely to be completed and may result in incomplete input from all interested participants.

Innovation Solution

A method for generating a form response interface in online applications that identifies content posts with interrogatory elements, parses language to determine form-addressable status, and creates user-selectable alternatives based on natural language processing, allowing for vote tallying and statistics display, thereby facilitating efficient evaluation and reducing redundant responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If open-ended responses are required for content post evaluation, then participants can provide detailed feedback, but the response listing becomes long and redundant, reducing efficiency and participant engagement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of feedbackVSAvoidevaluation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the response collection process into two parts: structured form responses with predefined options for efficient tallying, and optional open-ended comments for detailed feedback. This segmentation allows the system to capture both quantitative data for efficiency and qualitative data for depth, resolving the contradiction between reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of response format from purely open-ended to a hybrid structured format with predefined options. This parameter change enables automated tallying and statistical analysis while still allowing participants to provide meaningful feedback, thereby improving evaluation efficiency without sacrificing feedback quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If open-ended responses are required, then participants can express varied opinions, but response completion rates decrease due to the effort required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse varietyVSAvoidresponse completion ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the response interface into mandatory structured options (easy to select) and optional open-ended comments (for those who want to elaborate). This segmentation makes the core response process simple and quick, improving completion rates, while still allowing for varied opinions through the optional comment section and multiple predefined options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by allowing participants to provide minimal responses (selecting predefined options only) when time is limited, while enabling excessive action (detailed comments) when participants have more time and desire to express nuanced opinions. This flexibility resolves the contradiction between response variety and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of information

If multiple open-ended responses are collected, then comprehensive input is gathered, but redundant listings clutter the interface and reduce readability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput completenessVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual responses into aggregated statistical displays showing vote tallies and response distributions. This combining approach preserves all input data for analysis while presenting a simplified, clutter-free interface that shows patterns and trends rather than redundant individual listings, resolving the contradiction between information completeness and interface simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates statistical summaries and visual representations (charts, graphs, tally displays) that copy and represent the essence of multiple responses without duplicating the full text of each response. This allows comprehensive input to be captured and analyzed while the interface displays only the synthesized information, reducing clutter while maintaining input completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9959006B2Generating a form response interface in an online application
Publication Date: 2018.05.01 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9959006B2 patent drawing
  • US9959006B2 patent drawing
  • US9959006B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach is described for generating a form response interface in an online application. An associated system may include a processor and a memory storing an application program, which, when executed on the processor, performs an operation that may include identifying a content post in an online application interface and facilitating evaluation of the content post. Upon determining that the content post is form-addressable based on the evaluation, the operation may include generating a form response interface element including multiple alternatives and updating the online application interface to display the form response interface element with the content post. Facilitating evaluation according to the operation may include parsing language in the content post to determine the presence of a form-addressable interrogatory element. Facilitating evaluation according to the operation further may include analyzing comments posted in response to the content post to determine the presence of form-addressable common language elements.