Form Transfer Grinding Belt for Airfoil Blade Slot Finishing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for forming complex shapes, such as airfoil blade retention slots, often result in inadequate surface finish, burrs that require manual deburring, and are time-consuming and costly, with inconsistent results due to the lack of uniformity and repeatability.

Innovation Solution

A form transfer grinding system using a belt with an abrasive surface driven over a form tool, where the belt's profile matches the desired shape, allowing for precise material removal and surface finish adjustment through pressure and speed control, providing consistent and repeatable results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual deburring operations are used to remove burrs and achieve desired surface finish, then surface quality is improved, but process time increases and consistency between parts deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface finish qualityVSAvoidprocess time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The grinding process is designed to perform material removal and surface finishing in a single integrated operation. The abrasive belt is selected and configured to achieve the desired surface finish directly during the primary machining operation, eliminating the need for subsequent deburring operations and achieving both productivity and quality goals simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If manual deburring operations are used to achieve desired surface finish, then surface quality is improved, but uniformity and consistency between parts deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface finish qualityVSAvoiduniformity between parts
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The grinding system is designed with self-regulating characteristics where the abrasive belt automatically maintains consistent contact with the workpiece surface. The process parameters including belt tension, feed rate, and grinding pressure are controlled to ensure repeatable results without requiring manual intervention or skill-based adjustments, thereby achieving high uniformity and consistency across all parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Shape

If conventional machining methods are used to form complex shapes, then desired geometry can be achieved, but surface finish quality deteriorates and burrs are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplex geometryVSAvoidsurface finish quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Traditional mechanical cutting tools that remove material through shearing action are replaced with an abrasive belt grinding system. This substitution changes the material removal mechanism from cutting to abrasion, which inherently produces better surface finish and eliminates burr formation while maintaining the ability to form complex geometries through the controllable motion and pressure of the abrasive belt.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If form transfer grinding with abrasive belt is used, then surface finish and uniformity are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface finish uniformityVSAvoidgrinding system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The grinding system is designed with universal components that can handle multiple operations and configurations. The abrasive belt serves multiple functions including material removal, surface finishing, and form generation. The form tool design allows a single device to accommodate different workpiece geometries and grinding requirements, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system significantly reduces processing time and ensures uniform, repeatable finishes and geometries, eliminating the need for manual deburring and improving the efficiency of complex shape formation.

Implementation Method 1

The belt includes an abrasive surface that removes material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

The belt guide surface includes a low friction surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8216026B2Form transfer grinding method
Publication Date: 2012.07.10 RTX CORP
  • US8216026B2 patent drawing
  • US8216026B2 patent drawing
  • US8216026B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of form transfer grinding a three-dimensional shape utilizes a form transfer tool over which a belt is driven. The form transfer tool includes a shape that is desired in the finished part and guides a belt that grinds an area of a part to a finished or nearly finished condition.