Integrated Formaldehyde-Stabilised Urea Production Process

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing processes for producing formaldehyde-stabilized urea often require separate facilities for formaldehyde production, leading to economic inefficiencies due to small-scale demand, and lack integration with ammonia and methanol co-production systems.

Innovation Solution

An integrated process that co-produces methanol and ammonia, including a dedicated formaldehyde stabilizer unit, where synthesis gas is processed through water-gas shift reactors, carbon dioxide removal, and methanol synthesis, with by-pass streams controlled to optimize carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide levels for flexible production and reduce the need for distillation steps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If formaldehyde is produced at a separate dedicated facility, then formaldehyde can be produced in sufficient quantity, but capital costs and operating costs increase due to separate facilities and transportation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformaldehyde production quantityVSAvoidnumber of separate facilities
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the formaldehyde production unit with the ammonia and methanol production facilities into a single integrated plant. The formaldehyde is produced on-site from methanol oxidation, eliminating the need for separate dedicated formaldehyde production facilities and transportation infrastructure, while still meeting the required production quantity for urea stabilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The methanol produced in the ammonia plant serves dual purposes: it is used as fuel/gas for the ammonia synthesis process and simultaneously as feedstock for formaldehyde production through oxidation. This multi-functional use of methanol reduces the need for separate production facilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If crude methanol is fed directly to oxidation reactor without distillation, then capital costs and operating costs decrease, but water content in crude methanol may affect oxidation efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistillation equipmentVSAvoidoxidation reaction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The oxidation reactor is designed to operate with crude methanol containing water, adjusting the oxidation parameters (temperature, catalyst, residence time) to accommodate the water content. This eliminates the need for distillation while maintaining oxidation efficiency through parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The crude methanol from the methanol synthesis unit is used directly as feedstock for the oxidation reactor without requiring additional purification equipment. The system accepts the methanol as-is from the previous process unit, eliminating the distillation step and associated equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Quantity of substance

If synthesis gas is processed through complete water-gas shift and CO2 removal, then CO and CO2 levels are reduced for methanol synthesis, but process complexity and capital costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO and CO2 levels in synthesis gasVSAvoidwater-gas shift reactors and CO2 removal unit
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of complete water-gas shift conversion, the patent uses partial shift conversion where only a portion of the synthesis gas is processed through the water-gas shift reactors. The by-pass streams allow control of CO and CO2 levels at the methanol synthesis unit without requiring complete conversion, reducing equipment complexity while maintaining sufficient reactant levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Adaptability or versatility

If by-pass streams are used to control CO and CO2 levels, then flexibility in production is improved, but process control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction flexibilityVSAvoidprocess control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The by-pass streams are designed with adjustable control valves that allow dynamic adjustment of the synthesis gas composition entering the methanol synthesis unit. This enables flexible control of CO and CO2 levels to optimize production rates and adapt to changing demand for methanol, ammonia, and formaldehyde

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for increased flexibility in methanol, ammonia, and urea production, reduces capital and operating costs by eliminating the need for separate formaldehyde production facilities and distillation steps, and enhances the efficiency of the overall process.

Implementation Method 1

subjecting the synthesis gas to one or more stages of water-gas shift in one or more water-gas shift reactors to form a shifted gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWater-gas shift reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

recovering carbon dioxide from the shifted gas in a carbon dioxide removal unit to form a carbon dioxide-depleted synthesis gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas separation: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 3

synthesising methanol from the carbon dioxide-depleted synthesis gas in a methanol synthesis unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMethanol synthesis reaction: Catalysis

Implementation Method 4

subjecting at least a portion of the recovered methanol to oxidation with air in a formaldehyde production unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMethanol oxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 5

subjecting the methanol synthesis off-gas to methanation in a methanation reactor containing a methanation catalyst to form an ammonia synthesis gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMethanation reaction: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentEP3390353B1Integrated process for the production of formaldehyde-stabilised urea
Publication Date: 2020.06.03 JOHNSON MATTHEY PLC
  • EP3390353B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3390353B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3390353B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for the production of formaldehyde-stabilised urea is described comprising the steps of: (a) generatinga synthesis gas comprising hydrogen, nitrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and steam in a synthesis gas generation unit, (b) subjecting the synthesis gas to one or more stages of water-gas shift in one or more water-gas shift reactors to form a shifted gas; (c) recovering carbon dioxide from the shifted gas in a carbon dioxide removal unitto form a carbon dioxide-depleted synthesis gas; (d) synthesising methanol from the carbon dioxide-depleted synthesis gas in a methanol synthesis unit and recovering the methanol and a methanol synthesis off-gas comprising nitrogen, hydrogen and residual carbon monoxide; (e) subjecting at least a portion of the recovered methanol to oxidation with air in a formaldehyde production unit; (f) subjecting the methanol synthesis off-gas to methanation in a methanation reactor containing a methanation catalyst to form an ammonia synthesis gas; (g) synthesising ammonia from the ammonia synthesis gas in an ammonia production unit and recovering the ammonia; (h) reacting a portion of the ammonia and at least a portion of the recovered carbon dioxide stream in a urea production unit to form a urea stream; and (i) stabilising the urea by mixing the urea stream and a stabiliser prepared using formaldehyde recovered from the formaldehyde production unit, wherein a portion of the synthesis gas generated by the synthesis gas generation unitby-passes either the one or more water-gas shift reactors; the carbon dioxide removal unit; or the one or more water-gas shift reactors and the carbon dioxide removal unit.