Format-Dynamic String Processing in Group Communication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication systems face inefficiencies and interoperability challenges due to the diversity of structured formats used in string processing, leading to complex and costly operations to ensure format compatibility across client devices, especially in broadcast contexts where not all devices may have updated software to decode certain formats.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of format-dynamic string processing in a group-based communication system, where the server determines the structured format of an input string, generates fallback data objects for non-universal formats, and creates composite data objects interpretable by all devices, reducing the need for format conversions and storage of client device formatting capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the system supports multiple structured formats for string processing, then the adaptability and versatility of the communication system is improved, but the device complexity and computational overhead increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformat compatibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the format handling process into distinct components: a format detector that identifies the structured format of input strings, and a format converter that converts between formats. This segmentation allows the system to support multiple formats without requiring all format processing logic to be active simultaneously, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a universal format as an intermediary representation that mediates between different structured formats. Input strings in various formats are converted to the universal format, which then serves as a common intermediate representation for further processing. This intermediary approach eliminates the need for direct conversion between all pairs of formats, significantly reducing computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system performs format conversion for all incoming strings, then the reliability of message delivery is improved, but the productivity and processing speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage delivery reliabilityVSAvoidstring processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing format conversion only when necessary - specifically, when the detected format differs from the expected universal format. The format detector identifies strings that already conform to the universal format, and conversion is performed only for those that don't. This avoids the excessive action of converting all strings regardless of their current format, thereby maintaining processing speed while ensuring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a format detector that automatically identifies the format of incoming strings without requiring manual specification or extensive processing. The detector uses efficient format recognition mechanisms to self-determine the appropriate handling approach, enabling the system to quickly route strings that already conform to the universal format directly to processing without unnecessary conversion steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system stores formatting capabilities for each client device, then the adaptability to individual devices is improved, but the storage costs and data management complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice-specific adaptationVSAvoidstorage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal format that serves multiple functions: it acts as a common intermediate representation for all client devices, eliminates the need for device-specific format storage, and provides a standardized basis for format conversion. By making the universal format multi-functional, the system achieves device adaptability without requiring separate format capability records for each device, significantly reducing storage requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the approach from storing device-specific format parameters to using a fixed universal format parameter set. Instead of maintaining variable format capability data for each device, the system adopts a single universal format specification that applies to all devices. This parameter change from variable device-specific data to fixed universal parameters eliminates storage overhead while maintaining the ability to adapt to different devices through format conversion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11792144B2Format-dynamic string processing in group-based communication systems
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 SALESFORCE INC
  • US11792144B2 patent drawing
  • US11792144B2 patent drawing
  • US11792144B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure provide methods, systems, apparatuses, and computer program products that enable performing format-dynamic string processing in a group-based communication system.