Formation Saturation Parameter Estimation via Probe Mobility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining saturation parameters of an earth formation traversed by a borehole are cumbersome and time-consuming, particularly due to uncertainties associated with the spatial distribution of formation properties like permeability, and require detailed invasion process information.

Innovation Solution

The method utilizes flow rate and pressure data to provide mobility information close to the probe, combined with water fraction data to estimate saturation parameters such as maximum residual oil saturation, connate water saturation, and residual water saturation, using resistivity measurements and simplifying assumptions to bypass the need for invasion details.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If detailed invasion process information is used to determine saturation parameters, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesaturation parameter estimation accuracyVSAvoidinvasion process modeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential measurements (pressure and water-cut) needed for saturation parameter determination, eliminating the need for complex invasion process modeling while maintaining measurement precision through direct correlation between these measurements and saturation parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the determination process into distinct operational phases (drawdown and build-up) with specific measurements taken in each phase, allowing saturation parameters to be determined through systematic analysis of segmented data rather than comprehensive invasion modeling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive simulation exercises are conducted to parameterize invasion, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesaturation parameter accuracyVSAvoidparameter determination time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary measurements of pressure and water-cut during the sampling process itself, preparing the necessary data before formal analysis begins. This preliminary action during drawdown and build-up phases eliminates the need for time-consuming post-processing simulation exercises

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent skips the intermediate step of comprehensive simulation exercises by directly correlating pressure and water-cut measurements with saturation parameters through established relationships, rushing through the determination process while maintaining precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Measurement precision

If spatial distribution of formation properties is fully considered, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesaturation parameter determination accuracyVSAvoidspatial distribution modeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent focuses on local measurements at the probe location (pressure and water-cut) rather than attempting to model the entire spatial distribution of formation properties. This local quality approach determines saturation parameters at the specific location of interest without the complexity of comprehensive spatial modeling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient estimation of saturation parameters without requiring detailed invasion information, reducing complexity and uncertainty, and provides accurate results through cross-plot analysis and iterative optimization.

Implementation Method 1

the pressure at the probe may be measured and processed in order to determine formation parameters such as formation permeability

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure measurement:

Implementation Method 2

Optical analysis of the fluid may be conducted by a fluid analyzer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical analysis:

Implementation Method 3

resistivity measurements are used to help in the estimation of the saturation parameters

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResistivity measurement: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS10557346B2Methods for determining saturation parameters of a formation
Publication Date: 2020.02.11 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US10557346B2 patent drawing
  • US10557346B2 patent drawing
  • US10557346B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods are provided for determining saturation parameters of a formation while sampling the formation. Flow rate and pressure data may be used in order to provide mobility information close to the probe. In turn, the mobility information may be used in conjunction with at least water fraction information in order to provide an estimation of saturation parameters of the formation such as maximum residual oil saturation Sorm, connate water saturation Swc, and residual water saturation Swr. Resistivity measurements may be used to help in the estimation of the saturation parameters. Initial estimations may be used as the starting parameters for a full parameter inversion. An interpretation scheme in the absence of invasion details is provided.