Formatting Device for Encoded Information Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing encoded information systems face challenges in adoption due to the expense and inconvenience of upgrading hardware to be compatible with new systems, particularly when pre-existing hardware lacks sufficient memory, processing, or networking capabilities, and requires proprietary or customized components for enhanced security and functionality.

Innovation Solution

A formatting device and validation system that includes an input-output interface, memory with computer-readable instructions, and a processor to format and validate encoded information, classify it into appropriate layers, and transmit it to designated destinations, such as local rules servers or POS terminals, enabling compatibility with new systems without modifying existing hardware.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If pre-existing hardware systems are used for validating encoded information, then system compatibility with existing infrastructure is maintained, but the hardware lacks sufficient memory capacity, processing capability, and networking capability to support new encoded information systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with new encoded information systemsVSAvoidhardware capability sufficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a formatting device as an intermediary component between the scanning device and the point-of-sale terminal. This formatting device acts as a mediator that receives encoded information from the scanning device, formats it into a structure compatible with the point-of-sale terminal, and transmits it accordingly. This intermediary approach allows the existing hardware to support new encoded information systems without requiring modifications to the core hardware capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The validation system is segmented into distinct functional components: a scanning device for reading encoded information, a formatting device for processing and formatting the information, and a point-of-sale terminal for execution. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, enabling the formatting device to handle the complexity of new encoded information systems while the existing hardware maintains its original functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If proprietary and customized hardware elements are used for enhanced security functionality, then security capabilities are improved, but hardware complexity and upgrade difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity functionalityVSAvoidhardware customization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The formatting device serves as an intermediary that handles security-related formatting and validation operations. Instead of embedding security functionality directly into proprietary hardware elements, the system uses the formatting device to apply security rules and procedures to encoded information, reducing the need for customized hardware components while maintaining strong security capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enhances security functionality by changing software parameters and rule sets rather than modifying hardware architecture. The formatting device can be configured with different security rules, validation procedures, and formatting parameters to adapt to various security requirements without requiring physical hardware changes or customizations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If new hardware elements are acquired and installed to support new encoded information systems, then system capability is improved, but expense and installation inconvenience increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport for new encoded information systemsVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The formatting device acts as a universal intermediary that can be integrated with existing hardware through standard interfaces. By using this intermediary approach, the system avoids the need to acquire and install complex new hardware elements, as the formatting device can communicate with existing scanning devices and point-of-sale terminals through conventional protocols and connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The formatting device is designed with universal functionality to work with various types of scanning devices and point-of-sale terminals. It can format encoded information for different purposes (ticketing, access control, retail) and communicate with different hardware platforms, eliminating the need for specialized hardware installations for each application scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If pre-existing hardware systems are upgraded to support new encoded information systems, then compatibility is achieved, but maintenance costs and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with new systemsVSAvoidIT maintenance costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the system into separate functional components (scanning device, formatting device, point-of-sale terminal), the patent isolates the complexity of new encoded information system support within the formatting device. This segmentation allows the formatting device to be updated independently with new validation rules and formatting capabilities without requiring upgrades to the scanning device or point-of-sale terminal, thereby reducing maintenance costs and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages compatibility and security enhancements through parameter changes in the formatting device's software and rule sets rather than hardware upgrades. This allows the formatting device to adapt to new encoded information systems by loading new validation rules, formatting specifications, and security procedures, eliminating the need for expensive hardware maintenance and upgrades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240412189A1Methods, systems, apparatuses, and non-transitory computer readable media for validating encoded information
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC
  • US20240412189A1 patent drawing
  • US20240412189A1 patent drawing
  • US20240412189A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system and/or device for validating encoded information, the validation device including a memory having computer readable instructions stored thereon and a database including a plurality of validation rules, and at least one processor configured to execute the computer readable instructions to receive formatted data from at least one formatting device, extract attributes associated with encoded information from the formatted data, the extracted attributes including at least one of a formatting device identifier, a store identifier, value information from the encoded information, and time information, validate the formatted data based on the extracted attributes and the plurality of validation rules, store the results of the validation and at least a subset of the extracted attributes in the database, generate modified formatted data compatible with a POS terminal based on the results of the validation, and transmit the modified formatted data to the at least one of formatting device.