Formerless Multi-Coil Superconducting Magnet Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for manufacturing formerless cylindrical superconducting magnets are complex, unreliable, and costly, often requiring expensive formers or external sleeves that increase the diameter and length of the coils, leading to higher wire costs and manufacturing complexities.

Innovation Solution

The use of an unstepped mandrel with parallel walls and a thin composite wrapper to precisely position and space coils, eliminating the need for expensive formers and reducing wire costs, while ensuring correct coil positioning and spacing through positively-located spacers and a tapered mandrel for easy extraction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If formers are used to manufacture cylindrical superconducting magnets, then coil size, shape, and position precision is improved, but the required diameter of the coils increases and wire cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoil size, shape, and position precisionVSAvoidwire cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the former from the magnet structure entirely, extracting the disturbing element that caused the contradiction. Instead of using a former to define the inner diameter, the invention uses spacers positioned on the outer surface of the coil to achieve the same dimensional control without the former occupying radial space. This eliminates the need for the former while maintaining manufacturing precision through alternative means (outer diameter control via spacers).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the traditional approach by controlling the inner diameter of the coil indirectly through control of the outer diameter. Rather than using a former to define the inner boundary, the invention defines the outer boundary precisely (using spacers and machining) and derives the inner diameter from that control. This inversion allows precision to be maintained while eliminating the radial space occupation of the former.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Manufacturing precision

If formers are used to manufacture cylindrical superconducting magnets, then coil size, shape, and position precision is improved, but the overall length and mass of the magnet increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoil size, shape, and position precisionVSAvoidmagnet mass
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the former from the magnet structure, eliminating its mass contribution. The formerless design uses spacers and precision machining to achieve the same dimensional control without the heavy former structure, directly reducing the overall mass of the magnet while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Strength

If externally machined sleeves are used to constrain coils, then coil constraint is improved, but manufacturing cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoil constraintVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the external sleeve from the magnet structure, extracting the element that provided mechanical constraint. Instead of using a separate sleeve component, the invention integrates constraint functionality into the coil structure itself through the formerless design with spacers, eliminating the need for expensive machined sleeves and their associated assembly complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the constraint function with the coil structure by eliminating the separate sleeve component. The spacers and coil winding structure work together to provide both dimensional control and mechanical constraint in a unified design, rather than requiring a separate constrained assembly of coil plus sleeve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If serially bonded magnets with individual coils stacked and annular spacers are used, then assembly flexibility is improved, but manufacturing time increases and tolerances stack up

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly flexibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple coil windings onto a single formerless structure with spacers, combining what would traditionally be separate assembled components into one integrated manufacturing process. This allows the magnet to be manufactured as a unified structure in a single production run, eliminating the time-consuming stacking and assembly of individually wound coils while maintaining the flexibility of the formerless design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20230086102A1Methods of Manufacturing a Parallel, Simplified, Formerless Multi-Coil Cylindrical Superconducting Magnet Structure, and a Structure as May Be Manufactured by Such Methods
Publication Date: 2023.03.23 SIEMENS HEALTHCARE LTD
  • US20230086102A1 patent drawing
  • US20230086102A1 patent drawing
  • US20230086102A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are disclosed with respect to the manufacture of formerless, multi-coil, cylindrical superconducting magnets, and a formerless, multi-coil, cylindrical superconducting magnet structure as may be formed by such techniques.