Methods of manufacturing a molded, formerless multi-coil cylindrical superconducting magnet structure, and a structure as may be manufactured by such methods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for manufacturing cylindrical superconducting magnets are complex, expensive, and potentially unreliable, particularly for formerless designs, which are unsuitable for high-volume production due to manufacturing tolerances and increased coil diameter, leading to higher costs and wire usage.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a mandrel with parallel walls or slight taper, combined with friable tabs or retractable pins, allows for the assembly of parallel SBM magnets with constant inner diameter, using glass fiber cloth to adjust coil diameter and reduce material costs, and a resin-impregnation process to enhance precision and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If formers are used to manufacture cylindrical superconducting magnets, then manufacturing precision and coil geometry control are improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoil size, shape, and position precisionVSAvoidformer structure and manufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the former from the magnet structure entirely, creating a formerless design where coils are supported only by internal structural elements and external sleeves. This extraction eliminates the complexity of former manufacturing, assembly, and removal while maintaining coil precision through alternative support mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces internal structural elements (such as ribs or support structures integrated into the coil form) and external sleeves as intermediary components that provide the necessary support and positioning functions previously performed by formers, but without requiring complex former assembly and disassembly processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If formers are used to support superconducting coils, then coil positioning precision is improved, but the required diameter of coils increases and wire cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoil position precisionVSAvoidcoil diameter and magnet length
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By removing the former entirely, the patent eliminates the radial space occupation that previously increased coil diameter. The coils are positioned and supported directly by integrated structural elements and external sleeves, achieving precise positioning without the additional diameter required by former structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Strength

If externally machined sleeves are used to constrain solenoids, then hoop stress reduction is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehoop stress resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite material sleeves (such as carbon fiber reinforced polymers or other high-strength-to-weight composite materials) that provide superior hoop stress resistance compared to traditional machined metal sleeves, while being more cost-effective to manufacture through processes like filament winding or resin transfer molding rather than expensive precision machining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Adaptability or versatility

If serially bonded magnets with individual coils stacked and annular spacers are used, then assembly flexibility is improved, but manufacturing time increases and manufacturing tolerances stack up

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly flexibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing time and tolerance accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual coil assemblies into a single integrated structure where coils are wound continuously or pre-positioned as integrated units on the mandrel before impregnation. This combining approach maintains the flexibility of individual coil design while eliminating the cumulative tolerance problems and lengthy assembly processes associated with stacking multiple separate coils with spacers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary positioning and integration of all coil structures on the mandrel before the impregnation process. By establishing precise coil positions and relationships in advance during the winding stage, the patent eliminates subsequent assembly steps and prevents tolerance stacking that would occur with post-manufacturing assembly of individual coils.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

5Device complexity

If mandrel extraction is performed after coil winding, then formerless structure is achieved, but manufacturing reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformerless structure simplicityVSAvoidmanufacturing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a disposable mandrel design where the mandrel is intentionally made from inexpensive, easily breakable materials (such as friable tabs or brittle ceramic coatings) that are designed to fracture and detach cleanly after serving their temporary purpose during coil winding. This approach maintains manufacturing reliability by ensuring predictable mandrel failure at predetermined weak points without compromising coil integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates predetermined weak points, fracture planes, or release mechanisms in the mandrel structure before winding begins. These pre-engineered features ensure that mandrel extraction occurs cleanly and predictably at specific locations, preventing unexpected failures or damage to the coil structure during the extraction process and thereby maintaining high manufacturing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS12469626B2Methods of manufacturing a molded, formerless multi-coil cylindrical superconducting magnet structure, and a structure as may be manufactured by such methods
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 SIEMENS HEALTHCARE LTD
  • US12469626B2 patent drawing
  • US12469626B2 patent drawing
  • US12469626B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for the manufacture of a formerless, multi-coil cylindrical superconducting magnet structure is disclosed. The structure comprises superconducting coils and annular spacers of composite filler material. The disclosure also provides a formerless, multi-coil cylindrical superconducting magnet structure as may be manufactured by such a method.