Forum Expertise Verification via Challenge-Response Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Web-based forums lack a mechanism to authenticate users' expertise, despite CAPTCHA confirming human identity, leaving readers uncertain about the accuracy of posted content and authors' authenticity.

Innovation Solution

A verification system that uses natural language processing to determine users' claimed expertise, generates challenge data based on that expertise, and compares user responses to expected responses to verify their knowledge, allowing verified content to be posted with associated expertise tags.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If CAPTCHA is used to verify human identity, then human-bot distinction is achieved, but user expertise authentication is not provided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman identity verificationVSAvoidexpertise authentication
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is divided into two independent modules: (1) human identity verification through traditional CAPTCHA, and (2) expertise authentication through challenge-response tests. This segmentation allows each module to fulfill its specific function without interfering with the other, thereby maintaining reliable human verification while adding expertise authentication capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary expertise verification system is introduced between the user and the forum posting system. This intermediary analyzes the submitted content, generates appropriate challenge questions based on the content's domain, and verifies the user's expertise before allowing the post to be published. This mediator ensures both human identity and expertise are validated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If anonymity is allowed on forums, then user privacy is protected, but expertise claims cannot be verified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser anonymityVSAvoidexpertise verification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs self-service expertise verification where users independently complete challenge-response tests based on their submitted content. The system automatically analyzes the content, generates appropriate challenges, and verifies responses without human intervention. This self-service mechanism maintains user anonymity while precisely measuring expertise through objective challenge completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional CAPTCHA is implemented, then bot filtering is achieved, but content accuracy verification is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebot spam preventionVSAvoidcontent accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary expertise verification before content is published to the forum. By analyzing the submitted content in advance, generating domain-specific challenge questions, and verifying user responses beforehand, the system ensures content accuracy is confirmed prior to publication. This preliminary action prevents both bot spam and inaccurate human content from being posted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10803203B2Self-configuring expertise verification
Publication Date: 2020.10.13 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10803203B2 patent drawing
  • US10803203B2 patent drawing
  • US10803203B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method includes detecting initiation of submission of content on a forum. Using a computer processor, an expertise associated with the content is determined. Using the computer processor, challenge data is determined based at least in part on the expertise. Using the computer processor, expected response data corresponding to the challenge data is determined. The challenge data is presented. An entered response is received in reply to the challenge data. The content is allowed to be posted on the forum based at least in part on comparing the entered response data to the expected response data.