Foundation Bearing Capacity Quantification for Shallow Spherical Cavities

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for quantifying the bearing capacity of foundations with shallow-hidden spherical cavities fail to comprehensively consider spatial three-dimensional characteristics, self-weight stress, virgin rock stress, and external loads, leading to inaccurate assessments of foundation stability.

Innovation Solution

A spatial axisymmetric calculation model is developed, using a spherical coordinate system and the Laplace displacement method, combined with the Mohr-Coulomb strength theory, to derive mathematical expressions for calculating the bearing capacity, incorporating parameters like gravity density, Poisson's ratio, and geometric dimensions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional two-dimensional plane methods are used for foundation bearing capacity calculation, then the calculation process is simple, but the accuracy of foundation stability assessment is insufficient because spatial three-dimensional characteristics, self-weight stress, virgin rock stress, and external loads are not comprehensively considered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of foundation stability assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of calculation model
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from traditional two-dimensional plane analysis to a three-dimensional spatial axisymmetric calculation model. By introducing the spherical coordinate system and considering spatial variables (radial distance, polar angle, azimuthal angle), the model comprehensively accounts for three-dimensional stress distribution around shallow-hidden spherical cavities, thereby improving assessment accuracy while maintaining computational tractability through axisymmetric assumptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the stress analysis into distinct components: self-weight stress of overlying rock-soil layer, virgin rock stress, and external vertical load. Each stress component is calculated separately using appropriate theoretical formulas, and then superimposed to obtain the total stress state. This segmentation allows systematic consideration of multiple factors without overwhelming computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If a spatial axisymmetric calculation model considering combined effects of three-dimensional characteristics, self-weight stress, virgin rock stress, and external load is constructed, then the accuracy of bearing capacity calculation is improved, but the complexity of the calculation model increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of bearing capacity calculationVSAvoidcomplexity of spatial axisymmetric calculation model
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a spatial axisymmetric calculation model that incorporates three-dimensional spatial characteristics through the spherical coordinate system. The axisymmetric assumption reduces the full three-dimensional problem to a two-dimensional radial-polar problem, maintaining accuracy while reducing computational complexity. The model integrates self-weight stress, virgin rock stress, and external load effects in a unified theoretical framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the Laplace displacement method with spherical coordinates as key parameter changes. By transforming the stress analysis into the spherical coordinate system (r, θ, φ) and applying the Laplace equation for displacement potential, the model simplifies the governing differential equations while accurately representing the three-dimensional stress field around spherical cavities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If comprehensive consideration of spatial three-dimensional characteristics and complex stresses is implemented, then the reliability of foundation bearing capacity assessment is improved, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring relevant parameters increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of foundation bearing capacity assessmentVSAvoiddifficulty of obtaining geometric and stress parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces the Laplace displacement method as an intermediary theoretical tool that connects measurable geometric parameters (cavity radius, depth, overburden thickness) with the complex three-dimensional stress field. This intermediary approach allows indirect determination of stress distribution and bearing capacity through solutions to the Laplace equation, avoiding the need for direct measurement of internal stress states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct mechanical measurement of complex three-dimensional stresses with theoretical calculations based on elasticity theory and the Mohr-Coulomb strength criterion. By substituting physical stress measurements with computational mechanics approaches, the model achieves reliable bearing capacity assessment using only readily obtainable geometric and material parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If theoretical analysis using spherical coordinate system and Laplace displacement method is performed, then the general solution reflecting spatial stress distribution is obtained, but the mathematical complexity of deriving bearing capacity expressions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of stress distribution representationVSAvoidmathematical complexity of model solution
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the Mohr-Coulomb strength criterion locally at the cavity roof and wall surfaces to determine failure conditions. By evaluating the general Laplace solution against the local strength criterion at critical locations, the model derives bearing capacity expressions without requiring complex global failure analysis. This local application of strength theory simplifies the mathematical derivation while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11970830B2Method for quantifying bearing capacity of foundation containing shallow-hidden spherical cavities
Publication Date: 2024.04.30 HAINAN UNIV
  • US11970830B2 patent drawing
  • US11970830B2 patent drawing
  • US11970830B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure discloses a method for quantifying a bearing capacity of foundation containing shallow-hidden spherical cavities, comprising: in Step 1, constructing a spatial axisymmetric calculation model for stability analysis of the foundation containing shallow-hidden spherical cavities; in Step 2, solving the model to obtain a general solution which reflects the spatial stress distribution of surrounding rock containing shallow-hidden spherical cavities; in Step 3, obtain a mathematical expression by derivation for calculating the bearing capacity of the foundation containing shallow-hidden spherical cavities; and in Step 4: completing the determination of the foundation bearing capacity. Benefits: This method has many advantages such as comprehensive consideration, high accuracy and reliability of calculation results, and may provide the scientific basis for the development of prevention and control against the instability of the foundation containing shallow-hidden cavities. This method is easy to operate and feasible to become popular in actual engineering projects.