Foundation Pipe Installation via Peripheral Soil Loosening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for installing large-diameter foundation pipes, such as those for offshore wind turbines, are inefficient due to the need for large, heavy, and expensive drilling equipment, leading to high energy consumption and environmental pollution from soil cuttings.

Innovation Solution

A method involving pre-drilling smaller diameter holes around the peripheral area of the foundation pipe to loosen the soil, allowing for efficient installation with conventional drilling tools and reduced noise, and using a ramming device like a percussive hammer or oscillating vibrator to drive the pipe into the ground with minimal soil removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If large-diameter foundation pipes are installed using conventional drilling methods, then the foundation can be created, but large, heavy, and expensive drilling equipment is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling equipment requirementVSAvoiddrilling equipment weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The installation process is divided into two distinct phases: first, pre-drilling smaller-diameter holes (20-80 cm) around the peripheral area of where the foundation pipe will be installed; second, driving the large-diameter foundation pipe into the loosened soil. This segmentation allows using small, conventional drilling equipment instead of requiring large drilling equipment capable of creating the full foundation pipe diameter hole.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The soil is loosened in advance by pre-drilling holes in the peripheral area before the foundation pipe is driven in. This preliminary loosening action reduces the resistance to driving the foundation pipe, enabling the use of smaller driving equipment and reducing the overall complexity and size of the installation system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If large-diameter foundation pipes are installed using drilling methods, then the foundation can be created, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoundation installationVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The energy-intensive drilling process is segmented into pre-drilling smaller holes around the periphery rather than drilling one large hole. This reduces the total volume of soil that must be removed and drilled, thereby reducing energy consumption while still achieving the goal of installing the large-diameter foundation pipe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of drilling the full diameter hole required for the foundation pipe, the method applies partial action by drilling only smaller holes (20-80 cm diameter) in the peripheral area. This partial loosening is sufficient to enable easy driving of the foundation pipe, reducing energy expenditure compared to complete drilling of the full diameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of manufacture

If drilling is used to install foundation pipes, then the foundation can be created, but environmental pollution from drill cuttings occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoundation installationVSAvoidenvironmental pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful drill cuttings are extracted and removed from the installation process by using pre-drilling of small peripheral holes instead of drilling the full diameter hole. This eliminates or minimizes the generation of large amounts of drill cuttings that would pollute the environment, while still achieving the foundation installation objective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The method converts the potential harm of soil removal into a benefit by using the pre-drilled holes to loosen the soil in a controlled manner. Instead of creating large amounts of waste cuttings from drilling the full diameter, the small peripheral holes create localized loosening that facilitates pipe installation with minimal waste generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Ease of manufacture

If smaller holes are drilled in the peripheral area, then conventional drilling tools can be used, but the soil loosening must be sufficient to allow pipe installation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling tool sizeVSAvoidsoil loosening effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple small peripheral holes (each 20-80 cm in diameter) are drilled around the circumference of where the foundation pipe will be installed. By combining the loosening effect of multiple holes, sufficient overall soil loosening is achieved to facilitate easy driving of the large-diameter foundation pipe, while each individual hole can be drilled with conventional equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of loosening the soil in one dimension by drilling a single large hole, the method distributes the loosening action across multiple dimensions by drilling several smaller holes around the peripheral area. This multi-point approach achieves comparable or superior loosening effectiveness while using smaller, conventional drilling tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the energy required for installation, minimizes environmental impact, and enhances the load-bearing capacity and stability of the foundation pipe by controlling soil friction and material displacement.

Implementation Method 1

at least one hole is made in the ground in the peripheral area of the foundation pipe to be installed using a drilling tool whose drilling diameter is significantly smaller than the diameter of the foundation pipe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrilling:

Implementation Method 2

a working platform with a ramming device for driving the foundation pipe into the ground

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

enhances the load-bearing capacity and stability of the foundation pipe by controlling soil friction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3034702B1Method and device for erecting a foundation and foundation
Publication Date: 2017.02.01 BAUER SPEZIALTIEFBAU GMBH
  • EP3034702B1 patent drawing
  • EP3034702B1 patent drawing
  • EP3034702B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method and a device for creating a foundation in which a foundation pipe (1) is driven into the ground. According to the invention, prior to driving the pipe, at least one borehole (5) is created in the ground in the circumferential area of ​​the foundation pipe (1) to be installed, using a drilling tool (22) whose borehole diameter is significantly smaller than the diameter of the foundation pipe (1). The soil material removed during drilling remains essentially in the borehole (5). The invention further comprises a foundation with a foundation pipe (1) which is manufactured accordingly.