Foundation Sensor Layout for Early Crack Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Building foundations often crack due to seasonal changes, ground moisture, mechanical pressure, and seismic activity, leading to costly and potentially catastrophic repairs if not detected early.

Innovation Solution

Embedding or applying sensors to foundations to monitor spatial changes and detect motion, allowing for early detection of cracks before they become severe, using RFID tags, electrically-powered transmitters, or depth-sensing capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sensors are embedded or applied to foundations to monitor spatial changes, then early detection of cracks is enabled, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoundation crack detection capabilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The foundation is divided into multiple sensor zones with different types of sensors (accelerometers, tilt sensors, strain gauges, moisture sensors, temperature sensors) deployed at various locations. Each sensor monitors specific parameters, and the collective data provides comprehensive crack detection capability without requiring a single complex sensor system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor system is designed to perform multiple functions: detecting cracks, monitoring structural movement, measuring soil moisture, tracking temperature changes, and assessing overall foundation health. This multi-functional approach reduces the need for separate specialized devices and lowers overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If sensors continuously monitor foundation movement, then crack acceleration can be detected early, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system employs periodic monitoring with varying frequencies based on risk levels. During normal conditions, sensors take periodic measurements at lower frequency to conserve battery power. When movement thresholds are approached or risk factors are present, monitoring frequency increases automatically, ensuring accurate crack detection while optimizing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system dynamically adjusts its operation based on detected conditions. Accelerometers and tilt sensors activate at different thresholds, and the system transitions between sleep and active states. This dynamic behavior allows the system to maintain high detection accuracy when needed while minimizing energy consumption during stable periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11868099B1Systems and methods for detecting, reporting, and/or using information about a building foundation
Publication Date: 2024.01.09 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA)
  • US11868099B1 patent drawing
  • US11868099B1 patent drawing
  • US11868099B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Cracks in foundations may be detected by sensing motion within the foundation. Depth sensors may be applied to a foundation, and the depths of the sensors may be read. At subsequent points in time the depths of the sensors may be read again. If the depths of the sensors are changing in a way that suggests that portions of the foundation are moving apart from each other, then it may be inferred that a crack is forming in the foundation. The formation of cracks may be used to take various actions. For example, the owner of the building that rests on the foundation may be information of the crack so that he or she may take remedial action.