Four Bar Link Suspension Axle Roll Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing four bar link suspension systems fail to effectively utilize axle bend and twist to improve roll characteristics, leading to deficiencies in vehicle handling, particularly in heavy vehicles like truck tractors and dump trucks.

Innovation Solution

The system incorporates control arms and pivotable joints with torsional stiffness equal to or greater than the axle, allowing the axle to bend and twist during a roll event, thereby limiting the amount of roll and enhancing roll control without requiring stiffened suspension springs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If springs are stiffened to increase the average roll rate, then roll control is improved, but the ability to dampen shock and isolate the sprung mass from vibrations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroll controlVSAvoidvibration isolation
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension system is divided into separate functional components: springs/dampers handle vertical motion and vibration isolation, while control arms with specific torsional stiffness handle roll control. This segmentation allows each component to optimize its function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control arms are designed with specific torsional stiffness properties localized to their structure, allowing them to provide roll resistance through their inherent stiffness characteristics rather than relying on spring stiffness. This local quality enables independent optimization of roll control and vibration isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If stabilizer bars are added to improve roll rate, then roll control is enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroll controlVSAvoidsuspension system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control arms perform multiple functions: they locate the axle relative to the frame, support vehicle weight, and provide roll control through their torsional stiffness. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate stabilizer bars, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining roll control effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Stability of the object's composition

If control arms are made more torsionally stiff to improve roll control, then roll rate increases, but the ability to absorb torsional forces through bending and twisting decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroll controlVSAvoidtorsional flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The torsional stiffness of the control arms is carefully selected to be equal to or greater than the torsional stiffness of the axle, creating an optimal balance. This parameter selection allows the axle to bend and twist to absorb torsional forces while the control arms provide sufficient roll resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration significantly improves the average roll rate of the vehicle, providing enhanced roll control while maintaining a comfortable ride, even in the absence of stabilizer bars, by absorbing torsional forces as bending and twisting motions that do not contribute to roll events.

Implementation Method 1

torsion is applied to the stabilizer bar, which causes the stabilizer bar to bend and twist

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorsion: Torsion Spring

Implementation Method 2

stabilizer bars are designed to have sufficient torsional resiliency to endure this bending and twisting motion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

pivotable joints, which facilitate relative motion between the control arms and the axle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP2534001B1A vehicle with a four bar link suspension system provided with improved roll characteristics
Publication Date: 2016.04.27 VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA LLC
  • EP2534001B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2534001B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2534001B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a vehicle and a method for improving the roll characteristics of a vehicle. The vehicle includes an axle, a sprung mass, a first control arm, a second control arm, a third control arm, a first pivotable joint, a second pivotable joint, a third pivotable joint, and a fourth pivotable joint. The torsional stiffness of the first control arm, the second control arm, the first pivotable joint, the second pivotable joint, the third pivotable joint, and the fourth pivotable joint are substantially equal to or greater than the torsional stiffness of the axle, whereby the axle bends and twists during a sprung mass roll event in order to limit an amount of roll.